Ordered in May 2006, these finally arrived today and I was wondering if these have either been rated, or if there are folks here who have tasted this already.
I think that just might be attributed to the style of the house. Rieussec is known for its sauternes being extremely fat, oily and viscous. A good amount of acidity would be needed to balance this out. I would think that since it is so young, it would be even more fat and oily. I had an 03 recently that was just starting to show signs of balance. I think most Rieussec’s need a minimum of 5 years before they get good.
I LOVE the '03 Rieussec - my favorite Sauternes of any vintage, any Chateau that I’ve had. Many say it is too ‘flabby’ and not enough acid, etc - I disagree, or more aptly, I guess I prefer it that way!
We’ve got a few bottles of the '05 as well, but I have not tried any yet.
Roy: Enticing aromas of toffee, cream, dried apricot and caramel. Full-bodied, very sweet and thick, with honey and caramel flavors. Long and rich, oozing with sweet, ripe fruit, this is like liquid candy. 96 points - Wine Spectator
I’m surprised to see a comparison to the '01. I agree with Tyler that most Rieussec needs bottle time (I’d say far more than 5 yrs), but the '01 was brilliant right off the bat.
Everything would be great if Lauren and I could kick this cold we both have…
But you’re right, we should do something small before the end of the month!
Thanks for that note from the WS. They mention nothing about acidity.
I loved the 2001 Rieussec and Suduiraut early and often. Typically I like my Sauternes with age. My favorite vintage for current consumption is 1983. The Rieussec from '83 rocks and the Yquem is my favorite of the decade, which is saying quite a mouthful, considering the 1988 and 1989!
I am something of an acid freak, so I truly hate flabby Sauternes, which really turns me off.