when 96 is on, wow, and this one was on. I might be biased after two dry weeks on call, but this is a fabulous bottle screaming for oysters–which I sadly didn’t have. Tasting ever so young, it must be a forty year wine, but I am not complaining–mind-bending depth with layers of citrus zest, crazy acidity, a huge wine that is impeccably balanced, a great, great wine. The finish is endless–this bottle makes me forget white Burgundy. Is the 96 Clos Ste. Hune even better? That is a scary thought.
alan
I haven’t had this one so not able to compare but I had the Clos St. Hune 96 earlier this year and it was simply mind-blowing as well so I guess they just nailed it in 96 all across
Nice note Alan. We had quite a bit of 1996 CSH and CFE in the cellar. Every bottle of the CFE was great and up until now, every bottle of the CSH has shown some oxidation. Not sure what might be the reasons for this in terms of winemaking, but the difference in experience has been very clear cut.
Hey Jeremy - I am surprised about the oxidation on your bottles of the 96 CSH since the one I had was crystal-clear and had no such notes but maybe we was just lucky with that one - I had the 98 last month and that had a more dark color and some hints of burned sugar and although a great wine not anyway near the 96 in focus and sharpness
This wine sends out mixed (and confusing signals, IMO). But, ultimately, I think it’s good wine, thoug the wines all show some oxidative elements. Not sure if it’s the winemaking or a cousin of the premox (the corks, I’ve noticed were unusually rigid in this vintage; silicone?).
My last two notes on this wine, FWIW.
trimbach cfe 96…butterscotch/caramel and grapefruit nose; good acidity and fruit and some of the caramel on the palatte; is this age or the vintage? nice long, round finish. Good wine…no hurry; will last til it’s 20…but beyond??? Maine: July 2010.
2/14: jambalaya . This wine seemed closed and maybe advanced/oxidized at first, but blossomed into a honeyed, leanish dry riesling that is very enjoyeable with some time in decanter.
This latest experience…seeming “oxidation” that blows off with aeration into a pleasant wine is a phenomenon that I’ve experienced in some Dauvissat Chablis from several vintages. (I’ve had other bottles between those two that had “oxidation” issues, but were not “oxidized”; my notes on them have disappeared, though.)
No recent experience with the CSH '96. Trying to hold mine until 2016…as , in 2008, I noted I should after enjoying one. They are VERY different wines from Trimbach in 1996.
Heresy, I know, but I still think Boxler’s rieslings are more special, the “way Alsace rieslings should be made,” to quote one fan.
Stuart no heresy at all. I think you are right!
I do enjoy both stiles, but find CFE a bit to round and in lack of expression (compared to the Boxlers). Especially Sommerberg is for me the Alcase-Riesling par excellence with its electrifying character.
Actually, I wasn’t present for any of the premoxed '96 Trimbachs I’ve heard reported on. My big one was the 1998 CSH which I brought to Jeff and Jim’s anniversary dinner. Should have been fantastic but … premoxed.