Interesting perspective - and I think the same can be said throughout CA as well. Folks like Rack and Riddle have made it possible for any tasting room to offer a ‘sparkling’ wine these days and many have felt obliged to do so. There are some wonderful, smaller production sparkling coming out of our area, but folks like Laetitia, for the money, continue to over-deliver though they also tend to be overlooked.
Many of those producing higher end chards and pinots are anxious to extend their products lines and this ‘makes sense’ - but just because you can doesn’t mean you should
I will tee up a 750 of this next weekend and see what’s in the bottle. My only experience to date with the wine was tasting from a hand disgorged dosage test bottle at the winery this past summer. So, I’m interested to see what the finished product now tastes like.
I’m with David, in that I really appreciate and value the Alpine and Horseshoe bottlings, Pinot and Chard. I guess though we’ll have to aggregate some opinions on the BdB sparkler and see, but based on the early TNs being logged into CT, the feedback is not very good.
My impression with this wine was it didn’t make a big initial impact, but became compelling and drank very well. It speaks of Anderson Valley. It’s the sort of wine that can suffer in a line-up, but is very enjoyable on its own - like, if you take it as it is, drink it in the context it fits, rather than fight it with expectation.
Definitely over-priced for drink now enjoyability. Count me skeptical it will improve notably with age, but who knows…
As far as the winemaking, as I said, it speaks of site. Do you want that masked? A Horseshoe or Alpine sparkler made the same way would probably be much more to you’re all’s liking.
Is it possible that there’s too much expectation for a BdB sparkling wine that did not spend more than a few years in cellar? Aren’t most of the better known champagnes stored for ~5-7 years before disgorging? For the Rhys BdB I would consider storing it for the same length of time it had at Rhys before disgorging. My guess is that this wine will develop well over a few years. Don’t lose hope on this one.
As I mentioned above, I am going to wait a while before opening any more bottles, but I have had a lot of young sparkling wine in the last 25 years, and this one was not up to par for what it was supposed to be.
Wes - as for expression of site, the sweetness masked any site signature.
I know very little of Oregon sparklers, but Beau at Random Wine Company made the most beautiful Gamay Noir sparkler for 2013. I have begged him to make some more. Stuff was gorgeous and he’s sold out. Curious if you ever tried this?
David - with you as well. This was sweet and simple -not bad, but not worth the $. I detected nothing in the bottle that said it would improve with age. Have 2 bottles and a mag left, so not quite sure what I am going to do.
We drank this NYE along side the Taittinger 06 Comtes, and agree that it lacks complexity, but we didn’t notice any overt sweetness,to me it was fruit dominant but more of a slightly underipe green apple with citrus notes. No brioche yeast notes.
It was $35 on Berserker Day and if you like rosé Champagne, I think this would be in your wheelhouse. It was made in the traditional method, which distinguishes it from a lot of the pet nats I’ve seen from Oregon and which have been a mixed bag in my limited experience.