2009 Fontodi Chianti Classico - Italy, Tuscany, Chianti, Chianti Classico DOCG (9/23/2013)
– decanted ~30 min. before initial taste –
– tasted non-blind over 2 days –
NOSE: DAY 1: expressive; dark red fruits; clean (no brett); hint of mint; very clean black cherry. DAY 2: the same as Day 1, but now with a hint of smoke, too.
BODY: blackish-garnet color of medium-deep depth; medium-light to medium bodied.
TASTE: very tannic; strong mineral edge; some garrigue in the background; black cherry; flashy, despite the medium-low to medium acidity; slight hint of leather; fruit is ripe, but not gloppy; a bit ashy; 14% alc. not noticeable; I imagine this would improve (“relax” ) with ~ 5 years in the cellar. DAY 2: much better than Day 1: leaner and more complex, with extra emphasis on the mineral and leather tones. Hold.
B: 50, 5, 12, 16, 8 = (91 pts.)
Posted from CellarTracker
Great detailed note, thanks. Dont have any 09’s but have a sixpack of the 10’s and contemplating trying one. However as i think 10’s are less aproachable young than 09’s, i should probably just let them rest a few years based on your note.
I opened a 2006 Fontodi CC tonight. Still tight. Good, but tight. I have 5 more left and I will let them age for a few more years. I’ll try an '07 soon.
Byron
Love the wines. Price kind of makes it tough to buy the wines.
Thanks for the notes Brian. I’ll sit on mine for 4-5 years as you advise.
Tasted at the Domaine, this wine struck me as much fatter and riper than both the Flaccianello and other Chiantis from the same vintage (e.g., Isole e Olena). There is a lot of stuffing here, but it really does need some bottle age to sharpen up, develop additional complexity/layering, and lose a bit more of that rustic character that is showing. Right now, the 2009 Isole e Olena Chianti Classico is drinking better IMO, although it does need 1/2 to 1 hour of air at least to show its stuff.