My wife and I tasted back through the leftovers – about a quarter bottle each of everything but the Chappellet and Frank Family (our two favorites last night) – that had been in the refrigerator overnight.
They were all a bit better for being cooler, but none of them changed much, which is discouraging. I’d expected at least some of these would have shown better on day two.
On retasting the Midsummer Cellars (her #8 last night, my #6), my wife, who is Turkish, said “We have a term for this in Turkish – wine that kills dogs.”
What’s wrong with dissing so many wines? Most wines are mediocre. Good wine is so good, but most wine isn’t good. There’s this odd antipathy towards critiques - like I’m short selling or betting don’t pass.
David, you know the hipster who tells everyone around him, loudly and at every opportunity, that all the music they’ve ever heard of sucks, and only unsophisticated idiots could possibly like it, and he is one of the select few who appreciate the small amount out there that is great, which inevitably is some ultra-obscure music in some style that very few people would get.
“Alabama Shakes is just fast food to make the sheep feel like they can access real music. Sure, some of their early recording you can find on Vimeo had some soul, but the new big label album is a total sellout. These days, I’m grooving to some B sides from an early indie label recording by Psapp. Oh, you haven’t heard of them?”
And I’m not saying that guy is wrong, or that there necessarily is even right or wrong when it comes to music, or that he shouldn’t listen to whatever he likes, but you can see how people who just love music and want to relax, enjoy it and share it can get tired of that guy hectoring them about how lame all the music they listen to is, and can get tired of that guy acting like they are so far beneath him in their tastes and discrimination.
There’s no reason you should care what I think, but since you asked why you get the reactions you do, I’m volunteering some perspective, so take it or leave it. You’re obviously a smart and interesting guy who is skilled with words, and you could probably engage people as easily as turn them off if you wanted, without compromising on your views.
As for your debate here, about the appropriateness of applying his strictly-for-adults words to a whimsical description of wines, I don’t know the lay of the land around here enough to comment. I will say this, though: To me, the words are inappropriate just about everywhere – an exception being a gathering of comedians at an event such as a Friars roast.
The debate reminds me of something an editor once said to me when I asked him if a certain questionable phrase was appropriate for including in a column I was writing for the newspaper I once worked for. And he said (and I’m paraphrasing here), If you have to ask, then you already know the answer, which is no.
On the other hand, I had no problem reproducing the uncensored Jeffrey Ross remark in the piece I posted on my blog site back in 2009. And I have received no complaints about it since, though thousands of people have read it.
But if he just called it “shitty”, it would have been just fine. Or is that only OK if the term is used sarcastically as a continuation of a juvenile meme?