TN: 2005 Williams Selyem Pinot Noir Sonoma Coast (USA, California, Sonoma County, Sonoma Coast)

  • 2005 Williams Selyem Pinot Noir Sonoma Coast - USA, California, Sonoma County, Sonoma Coast (2/13/2010)
    It takes a while for this wine to open up, yet with some air it does seem to be in a very nice drinking window for those who like bright fruit in their Pinot Noir, with classic Sonoma styling. After a few hours, the nose opens up to a hefty dose of cola and violets, with red cherry dominating. Some purfume and heat as well, but in check. The mouthfeel is strong on acidic bite, from start to finish, and the low ABV is welcome, as I would anticipate that if it was over 14%, it would be overpowering. More cherry and cola on the palate, additional berry notes, nice minerality with a touch of bitterness, and perhaps a hint of mocha flavoring in that cola. The finish is rather acidic, as mentioned earlier, and has a bit of steminess or greenness to it, with sour cherry coming through in the middle point of the finish. It fades off quite gracefully. I’m sure this would have lasted 5-10 more years. (90 pts.)

Posted from CellarTracker

the more W-S i drink the move convinced i am these wines need real cellar time. not peeking @ their 05 wines for a few more years.

The wines really do need significant time. Even at the lower level wines. Five years from vintage at a minimum, as a general rule. More for the SVDs.

And I’m right at the minimum!

I saved a bit for tonight to see how it developed. I also have a bottle of '05 Sonoma County that will sit some more time in the cellar.

+1 on that rule for Selyems

For what it’s worth, I tend to prefer the Sonoma County to the Sonoma Coast bottling.

WS lost much of its magic since Burt ‘retired’. Stayed on through 2004. The wine was not t o my liking. Too much acidity, rather unfocused at times - the best examples missing that zing - extra dimension reminiscent of wines produced in 92,94 and 95.

There is an exception though. I finished my last 2000 WS Chardonnay. It was just stunning.

Top notch chardonnay should be left to age. The same can be said for high-end cali pinot.

I don’t doubt that the new WS have the acidity needed to age. I am just unsure if they have the fruit/flavor foundation for the long haul.

I sold cases of WS five years ago. I recently tasted a friends 98 Allen and Riverblock pinot. Both were disappointing. Perhaps it was the lean vintage. This was the last elevage that Burt consulted through though.

The bottom line is that a lot has happened since 2008. So many good to great pinots are produced year in year out. What use to be a WS hallmark as the anointed garagists - is regularly produced dozens of times over again every year.

I wished that Bob Cabral made pinots with the same deft touch applied to his chardonnays. Perhaps he needs to look at his fruit sources -and, GASP, abandon the formulaic regiment. He’s a terrific winemaker - doing it more cleanly that Burt - but he needs to take more risk.

Todd; Glad you enjoy the Williams-Selyem and I think you hit it on the nail with this comment…“. It fades off quite gracefully. I’m sure this would have lasted 5-10 more years. (90 pts.)” I really enjoy my W-S, especially the SVDs with at least 7 years of age and often with much more. A 2001 “Rochioli Riverblock” that I shared with Glenn last week was positively singing and in no danger of fading…glad I have more! It was an awesome match for Flannery szechuan pepper crusted seared tuna!


Cheers!
Marshall [wink.gif]

wasn’t Greg’s tuna amazing with all 3 of those wines Marshall? best pure pairing i have enjoyed in a long time.

Absolutely!!!
2001 Williams-Selyem “Rochioi Riverblock”
2001 Rochioli “Riverblock”
2001 Joseph Swan “Trenton”

Exactly what food, wines and friends should be!! [winner.gif]


Cheers!
Marshall [wink.gif]

Glenn; Nice edit…didn’t see the picture before!

Cheers!
Marshall [wink.gif]

Melinda had the photo Marshall so i tossed it up there. went PN tasting Weds in W Co but nothing like these 3 bottles man.