Just was looking through the catalogs, I certainly wasn’t paying attention to DRC at auction at that point, so it’s interesting to go back through them…With current knowledge, reading JKs tasting notes on all the Cellar I and II wines is both sickening and hilarious at the same time…Rudy is mentioned intermittently in his DRC notes. “Fresh” and “young” also appear a lot in 20s, 30s and 40s DRC TNs
I’m sure this is nothing new to folks who followed this auction, but looking at the DRC lot descriptions, many just seem odd to me…to pick one random example from Cellar II:
2173
Romanée-Conti - Vintage 1962
Domaine de la Romanée-Conti
1-4.5cm bc, 12lbsl, 12lscl,
embossed wax capsule,
outstanding color and condition
12 bottles per lot $90000-120000
The bolded line bothers me the most I think…are they really saying that just one single bottle in the whole case of 45 year old wine (at the time of the auction in '07) has any ullage?
They note multiple ullages on this 6 bottle lot earlier in the catalog:
2068
La Tâche - Vintage 1964
Domaine de la Romanée-Conti
1-4.5cm bc, 2-5.5cm bc, 6lbsl, 2cuc, 2sdc, 1spc,
1 no monopole label, outstanding color
6 bottles per lot $7500-9500
Wouldn’t all the bottles in an age appropriate case all have age appropriate ullage, give or take a bit for cork variation/seals/whatever? I can certainly see how these auctions could have raised volumes of questions about where these wines came from…
Anyway, hindsight is 20/20, I know. We now know Rudy’s magic cellar really was magical, and unaffected by entropy. Or reality.