Some Chateau Montrose at MacArthur Liquors

Yesterday, Charlotte Bouygues, owner of Chateau Montrose, and Arnuad Frederic, Sales Director, were at MacArthur Liquors tasting a few wines. Had to rush from the golf course to get there on time (life is tough), but it was worth it. Very impressed by the wines. I very much liked a 2014 Dame de Montrose. Very elegant wine with good fruit and a nice finish. Very well balanced.

We had two vintages of Chateau Montrose - a 2015 and a 2019. Very impressive wines that are rich and much more approachable than young vintages of Montrose have traditionally been. The wines seemed very similar, but when they are that good I cannot hold that against them.

Interestingly, this is the second very tasty 2015 I have had over the last month or so - the other being a Leoville Poyferre that I had when I was in Bordeaux at the end of August. From these wines, I wonder if 2015s are settling down some and will be better than I would have thought a few years ago.

When I was in Bordeaux, our guide Henri Challeau, said he thought that 2015 had very similar weather to 2009, but that the vintage is more successful because wineries learned from the earlier vintage better how to handle these conditions. I wonder (did not ask) if this included picking earlier. While the 2009 Montrose was probably the best 2009 I have had, too many 2009s seem to be made from overripe fruit. The 2009 Leoville Poyferre was one of these wines and I did not expect to like the 2015 when I had it at the winery. I was very pleasantly surprised and then was pleased tasted the Montrose (probably less surprised because the 2009 was also so good and because this is such a great winery).

In any case, both the 2015 and the wonderful 2019 Montroses are outstanding.

10 Likes

Between this and your emails today, Howard , I think I’m inspired to go buy some recent vintages of Montrose, even at my right age of 58. You and Mark Golodetz are raving about these wines. I have to admit that I’m surprised about the comments on 2015, vintage that I have not liked across-the-board, but maybe Montrose being what it is, is just a different animal here. I would think 2016 and 2019 would be the big winners. It may be 2020.

1 Like

I would have enjoyed that, Howard. The '15 Dame is also quite nice. Bought a bunch of that in 375

2 Likes

The only recent Montrose I have had was a 2020. Worthy of the accolades.

Robert, as I said, Montrose made a 2009 I liked, a rarity.

1 Like

I have not tasted the 2019 first growths, but have other tasted most of the top estates. 2019 Montrose was my favorite by a good margin.

3 Likes

Sounds fun - thanks for posting! I shall look out for Dame de Montrose 2014! Sadly I agree about 2009 - I’m starting to work my way through mine and Lafon Rochet last night was another disappointment.

Well, I have a half case of the ‘16 bought EP, so I was 65 yo then; when ever I spot that listing in my inventory I vacillate between “Oh boy!” to “ WTF was I thinking?”.

2 Likes

Given recent warm vintages, I think 2015 looks a lot less ripe in retrospect. Often lower alcohol too (looking at left bank in particular). Then again, I never subscribed to the view that 2015 was some spoofy, extreme vintage.

One of the more difficult aspects of getting older is feeling guilty (or stupid) about buying new vintages of wines I love. I know that this makes me lucky that I don’t have worse things to worry about (and that I have a cellar full of aged wines to drink) but I miss not getting excited about new vintages.

Where I have come out (so far) is to cut way back on purchases, but have occasional splurges when I taste something I really like, visit Bordeaux or Burgundy, etc., etc.

2 Likes

Sorry about the 2009 Lafon Rochet. What a shame. I don’t know young vintages of Bordeaux very much anymore and drinking highly rated vintages that are overripe like 2009 make me nervous about buying anything EP or otherwise where I have not tasted through the vintage. So, I have not bought any 2020s, 2021s, 2022s, or 2023s so far. Rather, I am backfilling more 2016s and a bit of some 2014s and 2019s.

Has anyone tasted 2022 Dame de Montrose? I can get some half bottles (I love half bottles) at $25.

2009 is turning out to be a bit of a minefield. Obviously we were told it was a stunning vintage because of all the ripe fruit, but you can have too much of a good thing. I bought a lot of 09s at release because I believed what we were told, but to be fair, many wines tasted a lot better young and I don’t think that at the time, many would have guessed they would turn syrupy. When I read the critics’ notes from EP or at release, nothing in them suggests any such risk. I think it’s a learning curve for all concerned, from winemakers to critics to consumers.
Anyway, my conclusion is that there is no point in buying stuff too young - better to wait a few years and try a bottle or two before investing further. Critic or not, I don’t think anyone needs a crystal ball to predict how 2016s, for example; will develop from here.
The huge advantage today is the relative ease with which we can find Bordeaux at auction, which was not always the case in the past. Perhaps one pays a little more (and in the case of 09 and 10, not necessarily) but it’s better than finding oneself with cases of stuff to sell.

2 Likes

MacArthur’s in DC? Were they in the area because of their RDV acquisition?

Great comments. Even at almost 10 years old, while I agree with you about 2016s (pretty obviously a great vintage), I am confused about 2015.

MacArthur’s is in DC.

1 Like

Thanks! I’m not sure about 2015. I bought quite a lot at release, but I haven’t really tasted that much yet. I didn’t buy enough 2014 and have been focussing on trying those that I do have, to see which to buy more of. Likewise, I’ve concentrated more on trying 2016s before reloading on some, because I’ve been so impressed. So 2015 is sort of stuck between those two. I think 2015 will always be in the shadow of 2016 but will reveal itself to be much better than some expect. Those wines I have tried taste nothing like the 09s at the same age. Like you, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed LĂ©oville-PoyferrĂ© 2015 when we visited this summer and that could be the case for many other wines.

1 Like

I liked the 2015’s at an EP tasting- they were really nice- and bought a bunch. I have mostly let them rest, but have tasted a couple since, most recently Issan a couple month back, which was really nice. From EP until now, they have always reminded me of the ‘85’s, which turned out pretty well. I am happy to drink them a bit on the younger side. Having said that, I have higher expectations for the ‘16’s, although I suspect they will take a lot longer to come around ( no recent personal tasting data, though).

1 Like

Time will tell but yes, an improved 85 - why not? Sounds good to me anyway.

Based on my TNs of recent vintages, I think there have been some subtle changes at Montrose, but on the whole I am still a fan- and there have been some stunners. I have not had the 2018, and in 2016 I have just tried the Dame de Montrose which points to 2016 being one heck of a great wine. But in case of interest, following are my notes for 2014, 2015, 2017, 2019 and 2020.

Despite a few question marks, I am overall very impressed. For my AFWE palate, 2014 and 2020 are absolutely spectacular- the latter clearly a legendary vintage in the making. The 2015 is also very strong but just not as overtly showy as its siblings. 2019 is for me what some 1989 Pomerols were back I when first got into wine- massive and jawdropping, but with a few lingering question marks about long term evolution (optimistic from me- but only after the wine had aired a few hours). And then 2017 seems a potential warning- as was a recent encounter with 2017 La Conseillante- that these perceived subtle changes may yield wines from lesser years that are not as balanced and charming as they could be with a less heavy hand. Time will tell.

2014 Chateau Montrose (tasted April 2018)

Inky purple color, rich cassis and pungent game and earth on the nose- classic Montrose in full cry, on the palate attractive and surprisingly approachable, blueberries, dark cassis, crushed berries, metallic notes, a slightly slippery feel to it as I often get here as well as with Lafleur and Trotanoy in youth (by slippery I mean it is like the wine is slipping over the tongue and not showing its full depth which is still in hiding, you can sense the depth but there is a sort of invisible barrier), outstanding finish, over the course of an hour it slowly blossomed and showed more immediate depth on the palate- but this is one to lock away for a long time. On a personal note- while I do not think the general changes in Bordeaux of the past 20 years are all bad, the fact remains that something I came to love in the vintages of the 80s and early 90s has been lost. 2004 was the last vintage where I tasted a wide range of Bordeaux before throwing in the towel for a time. Since I started tasting higher end Bordeaux again in small measure (starting with the 2012 Chateau Margaux), the 2014 Montrose is the first wine I have encountered with something of that old school rough and tumble that I miss so much from days past- and ironically appearing in an unusually forward vintage for the wine. But whether you like things the old way or the new, this is a superb claret that should handsomely reward some cellar time.

*( *** )+, 2030-2055

2015 Chateau Montrose (tasted December 2019)

moderately deep red/purple color, lovely nose of cassis and crushed blackberries with hints of raspberry, on the darker side of the fruit spectrum, on the palate a bit light when first opened and slippery across the palate, cassis, berries, chalk streaks, great tension, fine long finish, about 5 hours after opening the wine is showing greater depth and fullness but also substantial tannins, a more generous flowing sensation of fruit across the palate, sandwiched in between two massive and very self-evident vintages I can see how the 2015 is easily overlooked- but I think it an unfortunate mistake to do so, while this will likely be leaner than the 2014 and 2016 in time- everything is here for this to be a ripe and more charming Montrose, as well as one that will be more harmonious with food than the bigger vintages.

(****), 2030-2055

2017 Chateau Montrose (tasted July 2024)

good bright young red purple color, on opening a spicy nose with cassis and raspberries, primary and undeveloped on the midweight palate but with some warmth throughout despite this only registering at 13.5%, 2 hours later- a more aggressive and meaty nose with plums now joining in, on the palate a contrast of lovely midweight punchy and slightly racy raspberry-dominated fruit set against a fairly strong dose of oak and still with some warmth in the middle, good chalky finish where some cherry notes pop out, while Montrose often takes a good long time to mature I think this vintage is going to be a bit less friendly along the way courtesy of the current dominance of the structure and oak, both punchy and peppery at present- it should come out well in time but the fun of early enjoyment that is common in more classic renderings of lighter vintages is not going to be had here and so that leaves me personally preferring to focus my attention on the exceptional 2014 here and there while waiting for the 2019 and 2020 to come around, in the bigger vintages Montrose is still a serious contender for the attentions of we AFWE types- but post 2015 I am now a bit more wary of the lighter years just as I have become with La Conseillante post 2012.

(***)+?, 2032++ if this puts on weight then I will have seriously under-estimated this vintage’s potential as the core character of the fruit is really quite wonderful

2019 Chateau Montrose (tasted May 2024)

opened and sampled 8 hours before serving

very dark purple red color, dense and aggressive nose of blackberries, cassis, plums and spicy oak, on the palate a gloriously chewy and painfully tannic young Montrose, at first opening there was a little heat on the finish but after 8 hours the sheer force of the mid-palate carries it well, crushed black raspberries, steel, cassis and plum of exceptional depth with a ferocity I have not seen in any other 2019 and gradually becoming deliciously ripe toward the end of the palate very much in line with the vintage, I have to look back to the 1993 Lafleur to find another occasion where a major Bordeaux was that much more intense than its peers from a given vintage, clove with time and a hint of rose petal on the incredibly long finish of chalky and spicy dark fruits with aromatics that expand and grow in scale for over 20 seconds, like a young 1986 the forwardness of the fruit makes this surprisingly approachable given its significant tannins and forbidding structure, as with the 2014 this shows a lot of the youthful vigor and brute force of great vintage Bordeaux of old, I suspect it will start to become approachable after only 15 years- but will have an incredibly long and noteworthy life.

(*****), 2034++

2020 Chateau Montrose (tasted September 2024)

in first 30 minutes- lovely rich very deep purple/red color but not “inky”, a bruiser of a nose with cassis, roasted plum, steely minerals and oak spice, on the palate a massive moody giant in the old school style, full bodied fruit that slips across the tongue- you can sense its great presence but not truly taste or feel it, black plums, cassis, saddle leather, wild cherries wrapped in dried tea leaves, cloves, this all leads quickly into a finish of enormous length where crushed red raspberries and chalk notes come into focus, 8 hours after opening - nose less giving now but has lost none of its potency, a dark mass of spicy cassis and plum, on the palate the fruit remains somewhat reserved but is showing more impact on the palate, incredible depth of dark primary fruit with gripping tannins, top note of crushed raspberries, a ripe and joyous note as well, long and aggressive finish that is showing less detail but as with the nose remains exceptionally muscular, clove note, a marvelous fragrance lingers even 30 seconds after the wine has been swallowed, glorious- where the 2019 shows a bit of a heavy hand, the character and sheer mass of the 2020 vintage covers any traces of that which may have existed leaving me feeling like I am tasting a top young 1980s Bordeaux- and thank goodness for it, comparing to other recent vintages this is a bigger and bolder 2014 very much in the style of a past many of us yearn for, a long wait ahead- but surely well worth it.

(*****), 2040++

7 Likes

Was there any conversation about 2022, compared to 15 and 19?