I don’t know, populism seems to be en vogue on both sides of the aisle these days. I don’t see any free market/free trade candidates on the horizon. Better not count on a political rescue.
You are undoubtedly sitting in front of, or holding, a Chinese made electronic device. That is by far the largest category of imports from China, followed by other electrical equipment. Shall we start with that?
Toys (especially motorized adult toys) and clothing would be logical categories to attack, but the former would piss off Trump supporters, and the latter would cause a significant bump in inflation.
Two thoughts on this - the impact on Napa really depends on the length of the trade war. Producers will ride out a few years. But in the worst case (You know who re-elected and no resolution) those who have significant Chinese clientele will suffer.
A longer term risk is that France/Italy/Spain see weakness and step into the void and take more or less permanent market share from the US. If I were selling wine from those countries I’d sure be doubling down on China. But gotta think twice about shipping through the straits of Hormuz!
Okay, but the question was about Napa, not California. The premise of many comments in this thread is that mainland Chinese demand (as opposed to Hong Kong) for high end Napa wines has driven up prices, which I simply do not think is the case—though I am open to correction.
Possible we see more and more secondary markets such as K&L and JJ Buckley buying more of the high end Napa wine and selling it at X% off such as Mondavi Reserve To Kalon for $99 a bottle rather than $175 at the winery. Maybe Opus will be $299 rather than $375 at the winery. Or Schrader for $199…
That would be a fairly normal differential, since the wineries usually charge list price so they don’t compete with their retail distribution network. The retailers are free to discount.