Ribera del Duero - where to start?

Resalte offers a solid value for sure.

Just stay in Rioja! [cheers.gif]

1 Like

I am very far from an expert on the region, but my favorite has been the Cillar de Silos. Though I haven’t tried the last few vintages.

That’s basically RDD in a nutshell though. Use of French oak is part of the DO regulations and it is a very dry area that is at altitude. There are some producers that coax more elegance out of RDD, but that’s not what Mother Nature is really giving the region.

I don’t know how you go about defining modern though on a region as young as RDD. It was made a DO in 82 and many producers have started making wine in the last 25-odd years. Or are you saying that ripe fruit and new oak=modern? If so, given your predilection for Washington wines, I’m rather surprised that you are looking down on RDD.

1 Like

I love Aalto and am on the hunt for more producers in this thread. I really like the French oak and altitude of the region. I tend to like the Riojas with altitude.

Not that I have exhaustive experience in the DO, but I’m hard pressed to think of any that are not modern and wood armored.

Separately, I would throw some caution on Finca Villacreces and/or Pruno. Various (good) years of that I’ve cellared do not seem to keep well, turning hot/pruney over time.

Exactly. I doubt that anyone would really care for the “traditional” RdD, whatever that may be. Of the new bodegas, one of the most “traditional” would be Pesquera, which is characterized by a lot of oak, much like Rioja.

What else does “modern” mean? Aalto is made from organic grapes, natural yeasts, no filtering, so it’s modern in that way. I’ve tasted a fair bit of Tempranillo from WA and I daresay they’re using Aalto as a model.

Dominio de Atauta is really nice for ~$30-40.

Wines by Perez Pascuas (vina Pedrosa, El Pedrosal and Perez Pascuas Gran Riserva). The 2018 El Pedrosal Crianza is $16.99 at my local New Jersey Bottle king. Great QPR.

Still can’t beat older Vega Sicilia or Pingus, even Flor de Pingus for taste delights. Haven’t tried any modern ones but from the descriptions, maybe not and certainly not at the prices they want now.

1 Like

Over a couple nights, I enjoyed the 2010 Condado de Haza [Ribera del Duero] and my thoughts are similar to a prior bottle from two years ago. This RDD is a husky, chewy 14.5% abv tempranillo showing fennel, cocoa, and licorice flavors. The tannin is resolved but there still some footprints of the wood treatment. For my tastes, it is low acid, and ‘internationally styled’ but of high quality, and ought to be versatile in the WBer cellar rack as it can be served casually, or to oenophiles, as long as they are not militantly AFWE. This 2010 is holding well but at age 13 has faded a bit on day 2 so I would suggest consumption, even if it’s not urgent. B+ over a 2 day scorecard, but one of those first glasses about an hour in was really singing, at the A- level. Natural cork, light sediment.

Rioja/RDD are difficult for me to pour into the ideal stemware – other than Georg Riedel’s suggestion to just buy them all – but I tried today’s Condado de Hazo out of 3 different styles from less heralded manufacturers, and I think this showed the best out of a (not pictured) taller, narrower more Tuscan / Chianti / Zin stem. Generalizing, I like older tempranillo out of bigger Burgundy bowls, but 2010 is at the cusp where it defies easy categorization as to whether it’s clearly young or old.

1 Like

I’ve been gnawing on a 2010 Hacienda Monasterio [Ribera del Duero] the last couple of nights, which is a thick, meaty 15% abv internationally styled red. It’s pretty good after aeration of 24 hours, when the heavy prune, licorice, sur maturite aspects shake out, and some brightness emerges. I’ve had a lot of this, in many vintages, since their initial US imports but I don’t buy their output anymore. Prices feel much higher, and the ‘uniqueness/singularity’ is less so, as others have aped a winning formula. (Current releases are $70 I think?) For my palate the bouquet shows anise, licorice and then plums, prunes, currants on the palate. Tannin is soft now, but the body/structure is apparent. The wood feels resolved, and the acid is (initially) low, but brightens up with air. The color suggests youthfulness, but given my consumption over the years, I’ve found H-M better on the younger side for ‘fine wine’ thus a decade or so after harvest is my preference. Light sediment, brown bottle, conventional closure.

Overall: I’m going to give this a B+, a rating more simpatico with WB or AFWE palates. This would be great for fans of California Big Flavor. I don’t mean any of that in a negative connotation; I have lots still and enjoy them.

1 Like