I only tasted the Silex.
A perfect year for this wine (2002).
All about minerality. Big in the mouth but floats like a butterfly on the finish.
Excellent stuff.
I loved most of the wines I tasted. I was disappointed my da Capo was corked.
Nice place to get some pizza and get started.
Thanks for collecting the names of all the wines Michael.
The Latour is a rock star. I have no problem with drinking it now, but can see how it will hold on for many, many years. Thanks Don for it and the HL Cab.
I’ve had it twice before, the last time on 29th June 2008, blind amongst all the other 1855 first growths with 6 friends. My notes then were as follows:
Wine F - Approaching the generosity, weight and fullness of Wine C, but in a more somber, properly reserved manner. Masculine. Neither opulent nor flamboyant, the wine glares back at you, challenging, seemingly daring you to drink it. Layered dark fruit, minerals, graphite, cassis, earthy. There is red berry/fruit on the surface, to be sure, but seems to be wanting to sink deeper into the middle. More terroir driven than fruit, to me. No material chocolate notes noticed.
Again, being rushed, I couldn’t write down an educated guess but fleetingly thought it to be the Léoville las Cases. I was wrong. It was the 1996 Latour.
The afternoon before the dinner, I recalled, upon the Doc’s prompting, that we had this before at an IWFS Latour vertical held at Bianca’s a few years ago. Unfortunately, due to too much wine, I lost the notes I took of that evening. Good thing the Doc reminded me as I had forgotten that I ever had this wine before.
Charlie,
This wine is such a big one but still seems to show grace and finesse. Young and all about the fruit at this point. I liked it quite a bit when I had it with Jennifer and Herb a year ago.
This was one of my two bottles I got from them. I think it has some room to improve.
FWIW
Don