Looking to get some peoples thoughts on these wines - specifically the 2005 Proprietary Red, 2005 Jayson Red, 2007 Chardonnay (not Jayson) - and just thoughts on the brand in general…
Jayson Pahlmeyer makes some excellent wines. I have had the pleasure of having some over the years and I believe the wines are well made and are age worthy. I also think he bought Merus from Mark Herold as well…another great age worthy wine.
I would stick to the Proprietary red for age worthiness.
I own Pahls of the mid-nineties and they are all doing great. They became too expensive for me after that but no matter… when I’ve had vintages from the 2000s at tastings I felt they were egegiously over-oaked.
I think they are a little over oaked as well. But I didn’t have the late 90s ones when they were young. So I was hoping that as they aged they would absorb some of it.
I only have experience tracking the Jayson bottling over a wide range of time and it has integrated pretty well.
I think the Jaysons will give you a good feel for the style and I have seen them in Dallas for 50% off at a few places a few months back. I do not remember if they had any of the Pahlmeyer, but I seem to doubt it.
The chards have always seemed excessively oaked. The non Jayson reds have been ripe but seem to age pretty well. The Jayson reds seem a little too oaky.
Don’t know about that and aging, but the early to mid nineties Pahlmeyers were some great wines and their merlots have to be among the best merlots ever from CA. I prefer them to the proprietary reds actually. Not over the top, just great wine - 1992, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Those are all I have. Later ones seemed somehow less inspiring, I don’t know exactly why. Drinking really well right now. The 1987 and 1989 seem like you don’t want to hold them too much longer. Those are all I have.
Only had experience with the mid-nineties Pahlmeyer Red Wine…'95, '96 and '97. All with +/- ten years of age on them. I liked them all for what they were…borderline CA Cults at the time of their release.
Their best years IMO (95, 96, 97), both the Red and Merlot. Tried some recent releases not too long ago, enjoyed the Chardonnay the most, right up there in quality with the best in California. The red was pretty good, but not up to the mid 90s. Only wine not that exciting was the Pinot. Had high expectations, but found it not very expressive . . .
IIRC Helen Turley left as the winemaker after the 97 vintage.
The mid90s reds and merlots have held up amazingly well. Given how luscious they were upon release, I really didnt expect them to age all that well, but they have remained very consistent over the years and I think that the 1997 is just starting to come into its own (the best 1997 red that I have had was one this past summer).
Don’t think so. He sold the brand to Foley for the very purpose of getting out. He was not canned. Rumor is he has a non-compete for Cab which should be about to end. In 09 he was making a Grenache at Juice Box in Napa, which I hear he plans to sell at an affordable price. He has ended many of his winemaking contracts, but still makes wine for Kamen and Celani.