NYTimes: The Twilight of the American Sommelier

As this is thread is going on about wine lists…

Recently on a trip in France and in Lyon at a specific restaurant there was a nice extensive menu of full bottles (~15 pages) but on the BTG page they had 2 prices, 12 CL and 43 CL, basically 1 glass or 4 glasses. BTG had maybe 5-6 Whites and 5-6 reds, so a more limited but still fairly decent selection.

I asked the Somm and he said sometimes people frown on 5 glasses (Full bottle) and want just 2 each. And if we are going BTG we can go through bottles quicker so they don’t sit open as long if we offer this option and lots of people opt for it.

There was ~10% discount to get the 4 glass pour versus the 1 glass x 4. First time I had seen that practice on BTG; I’ve seen 3oz or 6oz pours or something like that, but never 1 glass or 4 glasses on a BTG page. Interesting concept.

1 Like

Yes, people don’t think in margins, they think in dollars. I chose the decelerating exponential based on my reading about preferences from mathematical psychology (behavioral economics). I’m sure that’s where YB is coming from as well.

1 Like

For sure, and I bet my own actual money on it every day and our list reflects that. Personally, it just seems pointless sometimes to even invest in a wine program when people incessantly write that they “only BYOB”, or “all list are gouging”, or just don’t understand the dynamics at play.

2 Likes

BYO is mostly irrelevant to our restaurant. Very few people do it. That could be because we have an excellent and well-priced (maybe too well priced according to YB) wine list.

I don’t understand someone drinking cocktails with dinner. I just wouldn’t do it, but I see people do it at the restaurant.

Regarding the wealth effect, I think for certain wines/people there it doesn’t matter what you charge. For example, I could sell Mugnier Musigny for $3000, but does it really matter if it’s $7000? I don’t think so. For most people, they’re not going near a $3000 bottle of wine, for the kind of person that would order a $3000 bottle of wine, it doesn’t make a difference whether it’s $3000 or $7000. To give another example, I have a decent Bâtard-Montrachet that I have on the list for $400 at a different French restaurant 10 minutes away, they have it for $600 when I talked to the beverage director about it, he shrugged and told me the same thing, someone who would pay $400 would pay $600 and the wine also works as an anchor for other wines on the list making them seem less expensive. All of these things have research that supports them. So who is doing the right thing? Me for selling a bottle at $400 (that no one has bought) or him at $600 (maybe he’s sold it, I haven’t checked)?

2 Likes

I was not part of that business, I just facilitated getting Joe to NC. It was a bit earlier than that. I think most people are state wide and the Charlotte market has gotten better for real wine, but you’re correct, all of the distributors who had what we would consider interesting books were in the Triangle. It’s just a different demographic (academia, Pharma, tech) that worked better for that (French, Italian, etc.) than in Charlotte (banking, steakhouses, big Napa).

That’s not true (at least in NYC). There are people who will buy expensive wines regardless of markup, but there are also a lot of people who will buy expensive wines who are very price conscious.

1 Like

I think you are partly correct. Except for many people here who will travel for fairly priced wine. I traveled to your area and suffered through one of the worst meals of my life to drink underpriced wine…

https://www.instagram.com/p/CRwm8hzLAp6/?hl=en&img_index=1

I posted an analysis of this maybe last year and it’s less than a rounding error. I understand why those on a wine board aimed at collectors would feel differently, but it’s just not relevant.

Yes, it matters deeply and it’s the opposite of you write. And given the revenue impact it’s worth really sorting out properly. If a restaurant is in the enviable position to both accumulate these types of wines and attract the kind of buyer that would spend that kind of money, then honing the right price pays massive dividends. It’s the difference between it selling and not selling. Thinking of inventory turnover ratios, cash management, and all the rest, the incentive and goal is to move wine, not store it. Sure, is it possible that someone might come in and take it? Absolutely. But if that hasn’t happened in some reasonable time period measured in months, then you’ve purchased the wrong item, don’t have the processes or training to sell it, lack the necessary customers, and/or priced it incorrectly. Benchmark pricing does play into it and we have some testing to do on that.

1 Like

I’ve done this, more than I should probably admit to! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

1 Like

Agree. $200 for an undistinguished $30 village bottle from a notoriously poor vintage is too much. I think this isn’t a joint with a carefully curated and cared for list. I think its a bin-end that year after year, no one buys in a market where folks mostly don’t drink Burgs.

So, fine. Pour it BTG on special and fill the cellar with things that people will enjoy and that will move in your market. You can definitely find decent village Burgs with high pleasure factor for ok money, even now. Fixin (Berthaut-Gerbet, Gelin), Ladoix, Auxey, other Marsannay and down in Beaune, entry level Oregon.

Folks in Amarillo need tasty wine too!

2 Likes

I think this discussion is difficult because everyone has personal preferences and argues from that perspective. There are people on this thread that only want to BYOB, but the vast majority of diners do not have that attitude. But I also think people are put off by blanket statements generally - when you say “you need to buy off the list”, you’re thinking of your well priced list. But when I say “I don’t want to be gouged”, I’m thinking of lists where I’m being gouged. That’s what I said about it being a two way street.

  1. As @Robert_Dentice has pointed out, arguably the cheapest way to drink new release wines is at restaurants, because they get better allocations than retail. So why BYOB to restaurants that have good wine lists?
  2. I drank a cocktail then had a mezcal at dinner last night because the wine list was bad, the wine we selected (suggested by the somm) was an awful pairing with the food and we gave 75% of it to the staff. It happens.
1 Like

Yet again, not what the analysis showed.

Typing out loud, not a manifesto:

I was wondering this last night. If wine lists are a source of key revenue and there is an audience for those overpriced wines - why should a restaurant offer a ‘reasonably priced wine list’ (define it what you will)? The only reason I can think is volume - turning over that wine list to make up lost profits in volume. I.E., you are providing more value for less money, and that results in higher volume to make up your lower margin. But if the average wine list consumer doesn’t care more about more quality (because it is incremental in the world of high end wine, or they can’t really tell the difference between Parker vs. Classic, etc.) - then the volume won’t come there - the value you are giving is lost on them.

So I agree, what’s the point?

Perhaps you can become a destination joint for wine lovers who turn over your list more frequently than otherwise (so you still hit your x% of beverage profits at lower markups) - hard but doable. Hard because in Manhattan, there is so much density here and only a few become wino destinations - and those that do become because of corkage policies versus ‘lets go to the list there’). Note, there are WB threads for the best restaurants in NYC, and another list for restaurants offering corkage - but no threads on restaurants with good lists! And restaurants with below auction market pricing are kept secret by those in the know (for example, Robert’s IG post). But I have to think its doable, because there are destinations (and certainly this is the case abroad)! It may require a different type of marketing. And maybe requires starting some WB threads right now.

Alternatively, would we need to see a generational change of wine consuming habits? Where overpriced lists become the rarity, not the norm - and those become discussed as places to avoid by the average consumer, rather than the reverse. Is this why orange wine is so popular, its a rejection of 4x mark ups on top of high retail prices?

I imagine we ended up in this position due to capitalism and economics. That is - more money can - usually - be made by the average restaurant selling those marked up bottles to the few, than offering greater quality to the masses. And you can A/B test and optimize it with data (or Ybarselah) to find that optimal price point.

After this thread, I no longer will get upset about overpriced wine lists. I now better understand the economics and their importance to restaurants. That said, I don’t like how we ended up here. I’d personally rather restaurants find ways to make more profits on food (I’m OK with simpler menus and ingredients, prepared well) or that I would be so rich to be able to afford the 4x markups on a wine list. Going forward, I will try to steer corporate card dinners to the places that offer good BYO, to provide them the revenue they may be craving.

PS Nathan - where is your restaurant?

what did it show?

Durham. Really nice spot with a good wine list :slight_smile:

https://www.rueclerdurham.com/

4 Likes

It wasn’t good analysis because it didn’t control for any factors and we have none of the variables. Basically a “trust me”, analysis on a thread where Yaacov had to walk back his premise of “it doesn’t matter so everyone should set it to infinite”.
For some restaurants corkage matters. For some it doesn’t. But set it to zero, and of course it will matter. Which means, it matters. It’s a competitive market - extra guests are never irrelevant.

2 Likes

People who love wine will buy more expensive bottles of wine if they’re priced well. Restaurants that cater to people who love food and wine could mark-up their wine lists more, but then they’d lose some of the crowd that wants to patronize those places. It’s a symbiotic relationship. Most diners don’t order bottles of wine at all, cheap or expensive.

1 Like

This assumes there is an audience.

And frankly given the ratio of crazy high end bottles at some of these places, I find it incredibly hard to believe that all of them are moving inventory.

It’s like the restaurants believe that if they sell the bottle, they won’t be able to replace it, which isn’t true. (at least in NYC)

I have nothing to add to this (very interesting) discussion save for agreement on this point: Rue Cler is lovely. I went there many times during grad school and I’m glad to hear it’s still going strong.

2 Likes

okay that’s hysterical.