Leoville and Langoa Barton vertical

We attended a Leoville and Langoa Barton Masterclass yesterday in London organised by Decanter and hosted by Lilian Barton-Sartorius, who is now the estate manager and owner, and Anthony Barton’s daughter.

I was most impressed by Lilian - she is savvy and articulate - also witty and not as long winded as some other hosts of similar events in the past. Listening to her and tasting the wines, I was reassured that the estate is in safe hands.

While not eschewing modern techniques she is sticking resolutely to the estate’s traditionalist ethos. There is no danger of Lilian taking a walk on to the dark side and cutting corners and fashioning superficially attractive young wines.

The hallmarks of these wines are harmony and balance. There is not nothing forced or contrived. There are no rough edges.

Chateau Mausevin Barton 2012

A recent new acquisition for the Bartons. It is 48% merlot, 35% cab-sav. A clean wine, quite closed and a tad astringent. But well made. 85

Langoa 2010

Grown under perfect conditions. This was initially closed down and was a dark crimson with a muted nose. Then it began to open up and was magnificent. Some peppery and spice notes, cool fruits, with minerals and graphite and hints of tobacco. Glorious texture and very fine. 94

Leoville 2008

A shy nose with mineral notes. Subdued on the palate. Fresh, lifted, balanced and harmonious, with hints of iodine and iron ore. Beautifully made, svelte and seamless with no rough edges. Will start to drink well in 4-5 years. 93

Leoville 2006

A larger framed wine than the 2008 with bigger tannins. As a result it needs protracted cellaring. It has graphite and restrained fruit, with a lovely mouthfeel. Silky, balanced and harmonious. 92

Langoa 2005

Still young but more expressive with more prominent and overt ripe and sweeter fruit. Even a tad over ripe perhaps? Noticeable denser on the mid-palate but nothing forced. Doesn’t quite match the seamless elegance of the 04, 06 and 08 Leovilles. 90

Leoville 2004

This is where the 2008 will be in four to five years from now. Cool dark fruits, soy, spice box, graphite and minerals, it is exquisitely balanced, refined and elegant as it glides over the palate. Perfectly poised and harmonious. 94

Leoville 2003

Much different to the other wines, expressive and open for business. Beefy notes with soy, dark fruits, plums and a tad pruney. This is a good effort in the context of a very hot vintage and is quite scrumptious. But I suspect it would become tiring after a couple of glasses and it lacks the elegance and balance of the other wines here. It would go well with Chinese food according to Lilian. 90

Langoa 2000

A super wine which is just starting to strut its stuff. Dark fruits, beef, tobacco and mineral notes, big structure with a dense mid-palate, but still harmonious and balanced, with a long refined finish. This is noticeably better than the 2005. Still only 12.5% ABV. 92

Lilian said the 2000 Leoville is still shut down hard, which is why she didn’t bring it.

Leoville 1999

Classically styled and still quite shy, it would have been difficult in its youth. But it is now coming out of its shell, and is a beautifully refined wine, with leather and spice box. It is still quite austere, but oh so elegant, poised, harmonious and fresh. Typical Englishman’s claret? It would be glorious with roast lamb. 92

Leoville 1996

A much bigger framed wine, more evolved, expressive and rumbustious with plenty of moving parts, red and black fruit, spice box, cedar, tobacco and minerals. Dense and powerful it is in the early stages of what is surely a long drinking window. Possibly lacks the exquisite elegance of some of the younger wines but fabulous stuff all the same. 94

I am very happy to own several cases of Leoville: the 2010, which in my opinion is the best yet, the 2008, 2002, 2001, 1996 x 2 and 1995. The one I would consider buying now would be the 2004.

Lovely notes, thanks for the contribution, and indeed, welcome to the Boards!

Love the 2004 Leoville Barton. Bought a case in 375s, and still have the bulk of it left. It has just started to drink well IMO. Thanks for the notes!

Welcome indeed, Ian. Great notes (We are a real-name board here; you need to add your last name in your signature or in the name field).

Leoville Barton has always been a favorite. Not as flashy as Leo P, not nearly as lofty the profile as LLC, but always fine, long-lived, reasonably priced by comparison.

There is more manipulation going on in the winery at Poyferre and it suffers for it; Barton and Lascases are among the purest expressions of unadulterated St-Julien, Medoc and Bordeaux.

Thanks Ian - really useful notes.

Umm, Las Cases was among the first classified estates to use reverse osmosis. I like all three Leovilles, to different degrees in various years, but I would not say that any of the three drink like adulterated wines.

Great tasting Ian! Must have been lots of fun!

Have always loved Leoville Barton. The 2004 is an awesome wine for the price. I think it has become an overlooked vintage for most of the Left Banks. I have a few 2003s that I haven’t cracked yet… Curious how those will eventually turn out. Had a 1996 Leoville Poyferre not long ago and it was glorious! The Leoville Estates are amongst the finest in Bordeaux in my opinion.

Juyuan

You are drinking well, Ian. Leoville Poyferre is my favorite of the three Leovilles, up through probably the 2000 vintage (with a few exceptions mixed in here and there, the 1996 Leoville Las Cases is a titan).

More recent vintages of Poyferre have left me less enthusiastic, sadly, both for the stylistic changes and the pricing.

Leoville Barton can take a long time to come around, IMHO. That noted, I often enjoy recalling Anthony Barton’s answer at a Fete de Bordeaux when he’s asked when the best time to drink his wines might be. He replied, “either lunch or dinner”!

+1.

I have in my cellar, and we drink, a lot of both LB and LLC. For the price, LB way overperforms and is under-appreciated.

LB is also a sentimental family favorite. My wife’s first bordeaux was the 1999, and it has been an anniversary wine every year since.

Great notes and a special tasting.

Ian,

I have had the 2010 L Barton twice this year. Its an outstanding wine.

I had several Leoville and Langoa Bartons (as well as Poyferrés) recently. I would concur that 2004 Leoville Barton is quite good. It seemed way too young for my taste when I drank it a few weeks ago, though. A real disappointment also a few weeks ago was the 2002 Leoville Barton. I don’t own any of that and I won’t look out for it. 2000 and 2003 may be my favorite vintages of Leoville Barton that I drank recently. Both are still extremely young, but they show great promise.

Leoville Poyferré is an estate I never really had on my radar. But recently drunk 1985 and 1998 were so delicious and fine that I’m looking out to buy me some Poyferré.

I would highly recommend to look at Poyferre. . . I think they make as good or better wines than Barton. Would be interesting to try 96 or 00 side by side!

Would be unfair to Leoville Barton '00 at this point. Still shut down hard as per Ian’s note above.

I’ve participated in '96 horizontal tastings in the past that included both Leoville Barton and Poyferre. I can’t recall when Poyferre had bested Barton in any of the tastings. Also, Barton was always a notable high-performer during the tastings.

Btw, thanks for the notes Ian. Always good to see your posts and insights.

Ramon

Thanks for all your welcoming comments. I joined here at the recommendation of my good friend Patrick Martin, with whom, Ramon and others, I enjoyed several memorable off-lines in NYC in 2006-11. He then headed west and I headed back across the pond.

We do disagree from time to time and IIRC Patrick has been as unenthused by Lascases about as much as I have disliked Poyferre. When I use the word dislike it is in a strictly relative sense. I like Poyferre, but it is probably my least favourite St-Julien, and I’m sure he likes LLC too.

While I have had some good experiences with Poyferre I have tasted some examples which have been over-ripe, over-extracted or unbalanced with harsh tannins, especially in more recent vintages. I would put this down to too much manipulation in the winery….

One of my friends in London tried the 2009 Poyferre last week – a wine I have not yet tasted - and what he described was a bit of a horror show: over-ripe, over-oaked, too low in acidity, ‘lifeless’ and with a short finish. Seems to me that, compared to the other Leovilles, Poyferre is a bit of a parvenu.

I do remember sharing a 1990 LLC with Patrick and he was nonplussed and so was I, but I think it is atypical, a rare lapse. Now the 2010 Leoville Barton is extraordinary, their best ever. Then I tried the 2010 LLC two weeks ago. Even better! I was lost for words. To be fair the Poyferre is good in 2010 too, but some distance behind the other Leovilles in my opinion.

Just saw this thread… Welcome Ian, nice to see you posting here! You are sorely tempting me to break my pledge not to buy any more young Bordeaux with your praise for the 2010 Leovilles.