I have a lot of deep pocket wine collector friends who love Northern Rhone and Iâve had the La Mouline, La Landonne, and La Turque several times, some of them with significant bottle age, and stored perfectly. And some of the other Hermitage monsters, like the La Chapelle, and I just donât find them to be that amazing. I guess theyâre just not my palate, my friends seem to love them because theyâre very mysterious and they seem to hold a lot back compared to the CDPâs, which I think are much more generous and accessible.
I suppose I prefer the Southern Rhones alot more, as I am not a huge fan of mostly syrah. Love great grenache and mourvedre. Though I definitely try to avoid the fruit bombs.
The La Louisiane tends to be quite forward and plush. The Souteyrades is astonishing. Such amazing QPR. Bordering on a profound wine for the money, with enough bottle age. A group of us drank this along with several other really outstanding wines, and this was the wine of the evening. Iâve been to this winery and the winemaker Joel Saurel himself said this is his favorite of the three. It was a 2010, and with 15 years from the vintage this bottle was in a perfect place, without the fruit having fallen off one bit. It was sumptuous and had so many beautiful herbal, floral, red fruit, berries, and forest like notes. Silky, gorgeous mouthfeel, and a long finish. Very good. 80% Grenache, 15% Mourvèdre and 5% Syrah and Cinsault, all aged in foudre.
Had Rayas a few times, thought it has been awhile. It is very, very good. But the QPR makes no sense these days, unless money is simply not an object at all. Henri Bonneau Reserve des Celestins is far better for the money, and if you can find a 2007, 2010 or 2016, that is about as good as it gets. Way better than Beaucastel Hommage, in my humble and relatively uneducated opinion.
Also Isabel Ferrando Colombis is amazing! But requires some time in the bottle.
Sorry for the thread drift here.
Those âLaLaâ CĂ´te-RĂ´ties and La Chapelle Hermitage are some of the densest, most powerful, and most polished expressions of the Northern RhĂ´ne. They lean toward showy, glossy styles; to me more trophies than soulful wines. Theyâre not the best gateway to the range of character the region offers.
Before writing off the Northern RhĂ´ne, if you havenât already, Iâd encourage you to try some of the growers I like who make more transparent, soulful wines: Allemand and Balthazar in Cornas, Gonon in St-Joseph, Benetiere, Clusel-Roch, Jasmin, and Levet in CĂ´te-RĂ´tie. Even something like Fauryâs St-Joseph is an excellent and fairly priced entry point that shows the perfume and balance the region is known for.
You may find those bottles give a very different impression than the big names youâve tried so far. If youâve already tried some of those, then youâre right, itâs just not your thing
Thanks for the recommendations. I have always been curious about the other Northern Rhone areas. I have had some Cornas that I liked. Yeah, I think those monsters are just too overdone. Not soulful enough. I love that.
I had my first one recently, a 2018 VV. Not OTT, the fruit a little more to the red side, oak was not excessive. But fruit was quite ripe and on the sweeter cherry side. Some classic Southern RhĂ´ne complexity.
Consider the hot vintage and the wine being younger. But that night it was not an ooze monster but not AFWE either. Good value for $30 or so. Might have been better with more age and/or decant.
The LaLas and the La Chapelles really need a lot of age. 10 years ago I had a 1985 La Chapelle and it was really a WOW wine: bacon fat, earthy soil, elegant and delicious. Everything I could want in a Hermitage. An example to look for going forward. Of course, YMMV.
Wouldnât that make it a possessive? How would you distinguish between Gigondasâ reds are better than their rosĂŠs and I like these two Gigondasâ?