For my part, I think this may have been the first time I ever used the term “Important” in the title of a tasting thread. And no snobbery intended- though in retrospect I can see how that could be inferred.
The reference had to do with the depth of the tasting and the degree of insight it provided. I might say the same if a horizontal tasting was of sufficient breadth. It is not intended to say the tasting is better than other tastings- but to reflect the degree of learning that it conferred. I am a big fan of Chateau Magdelaine, but seeing so many vintages side by side had a profound impact on my understanding of the vineyard and just how long-lived the wines are built to be.
I have attended tastings that had a far greater bottle count and/or a much higher market value, but they did not confer the degree of insight that a carefully focused tasting like this can do with respect to the narrow focus that is the tasting’s theme.
That said, the jabs are well-merited and accepted in good spirit.
wines that make you think and jot down a response are considered important to me. It can be a single digit priced wine or a triple+ digit priced wine. I would love to see more tasting notes on this site about more accessible wines. Those of you posting unicorn wine notes please don’t stop either.
I thought this had come about because the French word for important actually has a broader meaning - i.e. some posters with French as their first language have transliterated their thread titles and hence ended up with “An important tasting of…” when a more appropriate translation might have been “extensive” or “significant” or some such. As French is not even my fourth language, perhaps somebody who knows more can chime in !
Since the genesis of this thread was one started by Tom Reddick, whose first language, I’m pretty sure is English, I don’t think this is a matter of mistranslation.