Hmm, I’ve Never Had a Diamond Creek Cabernet, What Am I Missing (If Anything)?

WINE TALK
#81

Had the 1991 VH recently and it was still primary. Not ready.

#82

Good to know Loren, many thanks. 1991 is a great vintage, vs 1990, a good one, but gives me hope that my bottles will be in good shape.

Dan Kravitz

1 Like
#83

Thank you Tom. Penciled in for before spring.

Dan Kravitz

1 Like
#84

Four years ago I served a magnum of '85 Volcanic Hill to the X-Pensive Winos. It was delicious and still going strong.

#85

Yeah, I agree. For that much coin I will buy other vintages

1 Like
#86

I think this is really where a knowledgeable customer is going to take their business away from Napa. $350 when I can get 2 bottles of PLL or other BDX either at or below $400 makes zero sense for me to buy that $350 bottle of wine.

#87

Agreed, but we all know there is a model for this.

1 Like
#88

Exactly. It’s the same response/reaction I had when I read your post about Cathiard. There’s just better alternatives.

2 Likes
#89

1994 Red Rock Terrace was delicious this past weekend. 12.5% alc. was a bonus.

#90

It was just a few years ago you could buy these at a futures discount inside $200/bottle! Like others, they sold and new owner jacks prices 75%+. Unfortunate and at some point…unsustainable?

1 Like
#91

Exactly. Could get them from 175-185 per bottle. Sad to see it go this way.

#92

I bought a few 2007 Volcanic Hill for well under $200 some years ago…any thoughts on when to drink these younger DCs or how long they will last compared to last vintages?

1 Like
#93

They should be ready now but try one first.

#94

The wines are fantastic, that’s all I have to say on that :+1:t2: