In fairness, people like Robert Parker, Mark Squires and Jay S Miller deserve much of the credit as to why you have not renewed your subscription there. I just reported the facts, something they have left out over the years.
Without knowing your interests in wine it is a difficult task. Are you a generalist or do you concentrate in one area? Old world or new world. Country or region specific? Will any of your cellar be for investment?
If you are asking which reviewer regardless of any issues, I like Meadows. He can be objective even with wines that are not his style or specifically correct for the terroir. His points correspond well to what I imagine that number means. For example, an 88-89 point village Burg will be a wine I will enjoy. He describes wines with real and imaginable adjectives. His time windows are pretty good. Lastly once you understand his scoring system, he can make Burg drinking affordable.
Jeff:
I subscribed to eRobertParker around 2005 and started buying wines more seriously then. Now my cellar is filled mostly with Parker recommended CA wines. As I started to drink them, I already found some of them unenjoyable. I find ‘subdued’ but complex wines more appealing and really dislike oak.
After 4 years of Parker, my time and wallet can only afford CA wines, I hadn’t explored too much into other areas, not even Bordeaux . I am realistic that my next sub should be some pub as focused as Burghound. Maybe after several years of Burg, I can go to the next area. Gilman interests me a lot due to Riesling coverage. Maybe I should focus on Riesling next? It is so affordable. Besides, I am afraid that Burgundy is a one way street, I may never return!!
No need to pay for any wine publication for riesling guidance, just download the Terry Theise catalog every year and subscribe to Crush emails and you’re set.
For the small niche which is:
Port, Madeira and tables wines from the Douro … I don’t think you’ll find anything better than http://www.fortheloveofport.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; newsletter. The free version is good, the pay-per-view … peerless within the realm of the wines presented.
I agree it’s hard to say without knowing what your goals are. Are you looking for a review-oriented publication like WS, Parker, etc. or a less exhaustive coverage and more specialized wine publication like World of Fine Wine, [shameless plug] Sommelier Journal, etc. Does it need to cover the whole world or can it be more specialized like Burghound? Different horses for different courses I would say…
I second Poppy’s suggestion. I love this magazine, and enjoy reading it cover to cover. I don’t do that with any of the other wine newsletters, but they’re good too.