OK, this is both spooky and amusing… I recently got a new smartphone and signed into the Amazon app in it just now. In the Recomended for You section there are “Women of the Vine” and… The Battle for Wine and Love by Alice Feiring.
So Lyle. You’re “no CA expert”, not a wine maker or viniculturist, don’t like CA wine and have strong opinions as to where CA vineyard siting has gone wrong.
I think you’d have one problem getting on the natural wine bus–your vines are in California. There’s very little interest from natural wine tastemakers in California wine from what I can tell, though from my perspective the arid climate should be more favorable to chemical free farming than humid climates. Where’s Peter C. to bring up geosmin?
Of course the higher Brix typical of CA also is opposed by Francophiles. I’m also wary of the whole pick by taste idea since taste ranges from sour red fruits to baked pruney fruit. Overall, though, coastal CA is an arid climate with a large diurnal flux. As an amateur speculator, I suspect these two terroir factors are tied directly to higher sugar production.
At any rate, I like the idea of non-industrial wine. I suppose that’s defining by a negative, but it’s also far less constricting than trying to define natural in an ad hoc manner to list one’s favorite producers. I find a fair amount of CA wines very ripe and very oaky, but as it turns out there is great diversity of non-industrial wine when you actually seek it out.
Dude, you need to relax. I said I’m not an expert and then relayed my tasting experience. You want a 30 page essay with a complete bibliography?
So in order to critcize CA wine you have to be a viticulturist? Is that what your’re getting at? So people’s opinons who don’t farm or own vineyards are irrelevant? Just to get it straight and 13 years tasting experience of wines from everywhere is null?
And if you think those are “strong” opinions I’d like to see your reaction when an actual strong opinion ACTUALLY takes place, which was not in the paragraph I typed.
So Laube, Parker, Josh Raynolds, Gilman, etc are not qualified? And if I want to express criticism of the Virginia Woolf book I am reading it is not ok with Carg or Dildine because I don’t have a doctorate in Brit Lit? Or can I not comment on anything where I don’t have a damn plaque on my wall for? Such hooey . . .
The point is not about the wines themselves, but rather the presumption that CA is not suited to the varieties stated. How can someone that is not a viticulturalist make a statement about where a grapevine is to be planted? Please enlighten us Lyle…we are all ears.
When I go to Germany and visit my 35 estates in a few weeks the winemakers and I engage in an honest and fruitful discussion of likes, dislikes, terroir, etc, and in my 6 visits to the country, I have been asked ZERO times if I am qualified to speak on such topics, because they understand what discourse is. Every time I sit on the pario at JJ Prum and speak about winemaking, terroir, soil, vintages with Katharina Prum, who is a lawyer by degree and does she lop accusatory grenades that I am somehow unqualified to speak?
I said I AM NO EXPERT (4th time I am saying this??), BUT I have tasted CA chard and Pinot up and down the state and in my opinion with such a low success rate to my liking I questioned if the right vines are grown in the right places. Maybe its just terrible winemaking then and they are planted in the right places. I don’t know which, I have said with humility, and professed my ignorance on the subject BUT humility is something many don’t know here, so it may be quite jarring to some.