Lots of occasions; we don’t have a problem getting through Sauternes. At many of our wine dinners we open 3 750s.
I wouldn’t drink either of those vintages right now. Not ready. If you’re going to drink something young drink something like 17, 16, 11, 13 etc. 88 is the best vintage for you to get, though.
I don’t find them sweeter, but much better acid balance. In fact the sweetest d’Yquem I’ve had was the 03 that had no acid to balance the ripeness. It was just sweet and flat. So I would say it’s quite the opposite for me.
I agree with Andrew here. One borderline exception is the 1990. A great vintage that sometimes shows as you describe it Alan. Not always, but sometimes.
Some (all?) of that perception can be palate preference. There are those who feel all of Barsac/Sauternes, Yquem included, is too sweet (I’m not one of them), and that German Riesling is where it’s at (no argument from me: BAs and TBAs can be terrific).
I think like all other Yquem off vintages it’s drinking well but definitely has less concentration than many.
Vinsrare does have it (and 03) in 750 for 300 though.
I had a taste of the 2006 last night and it was incredible. Not a known great year but that bottle was singing. I don’t think there are many bad years for Yquem
I don’t see any notes here on the 1976, which is the sole bottle of d’Yquem I own (a bday gift from friends in October 1983 - must’ve been for my bat mitzvah or quinceañera!).