Chicago Rotating Dinner Series - Williams Selyem 10 Year Retrospective

CHICAGO ROTATING DINNER SERIES - WILLIAMS SELYEM 10 YEAR RETROSPECTIVE - Perrenial Virant, Chicago (4/8/2014)

It was my time to host our monthly wine dinner and I decided to go with a 10 year retrospective of the 2004 Pinot Noir vintage at Williams Selyem.

I thought this would be an interesting theme as in my experience Williams Selyem Pinots demand age (they can be a bit monolithic in their youth) and 10-15 years can be a sweet spot. Additionally the wide range of benchmark vineyards across the key Pinot Noir producing regions would provide an interesting look at California terroir. My understanding is the winemaking approach is very similar across the different bottlings, so we had a good opportunity to see how the influence of the individual vineyards.

2004 has a reputation as a hot dry vintage in California. Bud break was very early and harvest was also very early during a heat spike. That said, for Pinot hang time was fairly typical, much of the vintage was under moderate temperatures and I suspect a lot was harvested before the heat spike. Alcohols of these wines were all between 13.8-14.2, not particularly high in Californian terms, and acidity levels were good with pHs all between 3.3-3.6.

We started with a 2007 Chardonnay, finished with a 2004 Port, and also had a pretty extraordinary flight of Burt Williams era wines as a reference point.

On the whole I was very pleased with how these wines showed. For me Williams Selyem is, and remains, a benchmark producer of Pinot in California. They really speak of a sense of place, and to me point to a style that is uniquely Californian in a good way.

All of the 2004s showed quite young, and I suspect this lineup will be better at 15 or even 20 years.

There were quite a few wines on display so my notes got a little shorter towards the end. A house style definitely showed through across the wines, especially in the high-toned floral noses, red fruit, apple skin and long acid profiles. The RRV wines probably showed off as the most distinct and big boned of the wines.

I ended up scoring the wines in a fairly narrow range, which is not to say they were all similar, but of similarly high quality but with significantly different expressions.
Starter White

Blowsy aromas of honeysuckle, ripe stone fruit and expensive oak.

Mouth filling ripe stonefruit – Anjou pear and peaches - lemon curd (thanks Izzy) and honey. Great acid signature keeps the size in check, although some heat sneaks through on the end of the palate. Great length. A very good wine although a touch on the big side to warrant a higher score from me. (90 pts.)

Burt Williams Flight

Intense nose of cola nut, wild flowers and macerated strawberries.

Crunchy red fruits with crushed red pepper. Good intensity and length. Heat definitely shows through on the finish and the >15% alcohol is unusually for a Williams Selyem. I wonder if the ripeness of the fruit got away from them a little on this wine. There’s a lot to like, and this can go on for many years, but I doubt the heat will ever dissipate. (90 pts.)

Room filling nose of a field of flowers, sassafras and baking spices.

Dense structure with lots of everything - cherry fruit, cranberry juice, umami (dried mushrooms) and spice. Great acid throughout the extraordinary length. Substantial tannin on the back end. A good bottle of this wine, like this one, still has plenty of legs left and will definitely see older age yet. For me this particular wine should be considered a Californian classic. (95 pts.)

Beautiful earthy nose of freshly turned soil, worn leather and violets by the boatload.

Lean but long on the palate, with tart red fruits, great apple juice acidity and a touch of red spices. A fine wine and remarkable showing from the lowest wine in their portfolio at 28 years of age. I thought it developed a touch of vinegar by the end of the night, so wouldn’t be keeping this any longer. Universally loved around the table and the one wine of the night that could easily be mistaken for burgundy. (93 pts.)

Other than Sonoma Flight

High toned nose of red fruits and blue flowers.

Juicy on the palate with a mix of fruits across the red to black fruits spectrum. Primarily cherries and blackberries with the typical and red apple character of Anderson valley pinot. The apple continues over to the great acid profile which leaves a lasting impression. This got better and better with air. A top performance from a vineyard bottling that is pretty inconsistent from my experience. (92 pts.)

Perfumed nose of roses, fresh strawberries and sea spray.

On the palate ripe strawberries, cherry cola and amaro. Good grip on the end palate. This develops in the glass and gets more savory and pretty over time. A nice showing from Vista Verde, probably the best I recall from a vineyard that is one of my least favorite Selyems. (92 pts.)

Very ripe, moving toward blue fruits. A weird wine that is most likely flawed. NR (flawed)

Sonoma Coast Flight

Intense and savory nose of star anise, red fruits and polished leather.

Complete palate of gravenstein apple, tart cherries, chewy rhubarb and dried shitake mushrooms. Strong acid profile with firm tannins on the finish. This one has quite a bit left in the tank. (92 pts.)

On the palate, sweet and sour fruited with lots of maraschino cherry. Late tones of damp earth on the very long finish. A little blocky for me, but may need more time to come together. (91 pts.)

Cerebral nose that speaks to a whole cluster element, very floral (roses in bloom) with brown spices, and eucalyptus.

Dense, smooth and lush on the palate with raspberry liqueur and bing cherries. Complex on the end palate with firm and structured tannins suggesting a lot of life left. (93 pts.)

Russian River Valley Flight

Rich liquor aromas, with dried herbs, licorice and Chambord.

Very rich on the palate with licorice, sweet caramelized strawberries, plum and winter cranberries. Moves to show savory qualities of forest mushrooms and Chinese five spice on the end palate. Soft tannins, but the power of the wine will probably allow it to keep for a while younger. The RRV flight definitely showed a lot bigger, although not lesser quality than the other flights. (92 pts.)

  • 2004 Williams Selyem Pinot Noir Bucher Vineyard - USA, California, Sonoma County, Russian River Valley
    Very medicinal nose – like an old time pharmacy. Chinato/spiced wine character with lots of dried herbs over the dried and cooked red fruits.

Sweet and soft impression on the palate with black fruits, herbal tea and old fashioned cough medicine. This was a controversial wine on the night with some thought it corked or faulty (I had initially considered corked, but thought it not the case once the herbal elements started to shine and with none of the telltale signs of TCA for my palate). The least Pinot like of these wines, but a very unique wine that reminds me of a delicate amaro. As an interesting wine, I really loved this, as a Pinot Noir I could see one being disappointed. 92+ (92 pts.)

Savory nose of cooking spices, roses and a hint of peat.

The most closed of the wines on display tonight… very much hiding behind its structure. Fleshed out over time revealing sweet and tart fruit. Has real intensity without ever overpowering and I suspect a very fine wine lies in waiting. 92+. (92 pts.)

Port to end

  • 2004 Williams Selyem Port Mistral Vineyard - USA, California, Central Coast
    Spirity nose of boysenberry and blackcurrant follows through to the palate. Too one note for me, although I suspect very young and this could turn into a treat with a lot of aging. I wasn’t inclined to drink more… and instead went back to the Pinots. (86 pts.)

Posted from CellarTracker

Man…picked a bad night to be in Richmond. This was one of the first producers that really built up my interest in wine.

Great notes Clayton, and bravo on the dinner, too.

The 90’s WS Summa’s are terrific – glad to see your bottle was representative of my (limited) experiences.

I also have never had a 97 Coastlands as terrific as others have reported, though the bottle we had last Thanksgiving was closer to epic than others tasted in other settings.

Burt’s Summa bottles are to be cherished! Margi has also done great PN from Summa.

Terrific write up. WS was also the producer that opened my eyes to CA PN. I’ve never had their Summa but, based on what I’ve tasted from RM, would assume the Selyem version of their fruit would be equally remarkable. Thanks for sharing some wonderful insights into many of their SVD characteristics.

I should add that Perennial Virant did a great job. Managed coursing very well, had good stems, and most importantly great food - Housemade charcuterie, Duck Confit, Rabbit 2-Ways, Venison Papardelle, Bone-in Pork chop, Midwestern cheese.

Terrific write up and notes. Williams Selyem is still my number one holding and consumption according to CT. Ten years is a great point to evaluate their aging potential and it is nice to see that they can age even longer. The Burt Williams wines were legendary and I, personally, did not see any drop off with the Bob Cabral era. With Bob moving on, it will be fun to continue to follow WS and see what the future brings.


Cheers! [cheers.gif]
Marshall

I have not had as much experience with Williams Selyem as Clayton. The first thing that I took away from this dinner was that California pinot truly can and does have a sense of terroir. None of the wines would have been mistaken for the other wines in the flight. However, in the Russian River, the wines were more similar across the vineyards.

The second thing that I took away from this dinner was that California pinot, or at least certain producers, will age very well. All of the 2004s, at 10 years of age, still seemed far too young. The1986 was drinking beautifuly and was the WOTN for me. I did not try it again at the end of the evening so I cannot comment on Clayton’s concern regarding the appearance of some vinegar notes. That said, I entirely agree that the 1991 and 1997 had plenty more life in them.

All in all a very impressive dinner which was well thought out by Clayton.

Great notes Clayton - nice to see how special those wines are turning out to be. 2004 was a tough vintage, it’s amazing how Bob was able to control the alcohol in those and turn out some exceptional wines. Weir vineyard is usually problematic in warmer vintages- just a problem with the site and the rootstock (can’t get enough water down to satisfy)- I do remember the 2004 being a bit weird.

Vista Verde - the running joke was consistently that “it’s the best one ever.” Every year… Just the nature of a site (800 acres total) being pared down and farmed to WS spec. Took a few years for it to get into balance.

The Allen vineyard PN’s are always delightful, if not as amazing as they used to be. It’s what has inspired me to make Pinot.

Once the change to Vista Verde for the Port happens (the 2008 bottling), I’ve found the quality to increase dramatically. The 2004 spent a bit too much time in barrel. Vista Verde- a bit warmer location, a bit richer…

'91 Summa - wow. There was probably only a barrel or two of that. I’ve never seen, much less consumed, a Selyem Summa.

It was a very educational experience and the 1986 and 1991 were real treats. Id agree with Jimmy that the RRV were the biggest and perhaps least distinct on the flights.

Most of the time, Burt didn’t think the Summa was of single vineyard quality (only made 4 times between 1988-1997)… It usually went in the Sonoma County bottling… I remember Burt telling me that often, the fruit would just “arrive” at the winery- often too early. You don’t often hear those stories, but Burt’s are truly priceless!

It really was interesting how young the 2004s showed. This has lead me to believe I should bury subsequent vintages of their wines and check in at 15 years.

I don’t have enough experience to compare the Williams era with the Cabral era wines. I do think some of the early Cabral wines (99-01) were a little off form, but I’ve like what I’ve seen since. I didn’t have any of the Burt wines young so not sure how they looked compared to the young Cabral’s from recent vintages. That said i feel confident the Cabral wines will see old bones and mostly be very high quality.

That’s interesting Trevor - from what i can gather when it was bottled as a single vineyard he saw them as benchmark examples.

I find the quality and age ability of the Sonoma County staggering for their entry level wine - how is it decided what lots go into it?

Precisely, also the reason he only made 4 of them. They were really special wines! The Sonoma County has always been a bit of a catch-all blend with things that didn’t quite make the cut for the other bottlings. Some years it can be truly great (especially that '86), others it isn’t as dynamic. Same winemaking as the single vineyards, but designed for earlier drinking.

It will be interesting to see how the BC bottlings evolve, some of the best vintages '05 and '07 come to mind- will be the hallmark, they are taking there time to come around…