Could it be that Gerhard Eichelmann is your favorite critic because your palates align?
ChatGPT needs a critical reasoning module added to it. In what way does Neal Martinās opinion of you have anything to do with your opinion of @William_Kelley ?
Iāll say something a little more logical (I hope). I really do appreciate your perspectives on Champagne and value your promotion of some producers with whom I am not familiar. Your polemics against one reviewer who is broadly admired (in my view, for good reasons) is tiresome.
5 Likes
I think itās because Donald is (just about) the only one on the forum that can read him, which gives him an air of authority.
William, it really is sad how often you need to defend yourself from these attacks, but I must say you do a fantastic job of it.
Iām sure youāre probably growing tired of the whole exercise, but I think I can speak for many of us when I say the fact you can continue to do so in such a professional manner without completely losing your cool actually speaks volumes about your character and helps me feel even more confident that I can rely on you as a āsource of truthā about whatās going on in the various regions you cover. Keep it up.
21 Likes
Galloni is an odd poster boy for integrity: he sells ābespokeā advance prescriptions to those in the trade, including shops like yours. Donald, do you have an early access subscription?
Iām not slagging Galloni only for his ethically-challenged subscription model. When he took over much of California from Parker, Galloni cynically heaped praise on the most unpalatable, disgusting Cali Cabs and Rhone knock-offs as had his then boss. There was no way the guy who only praised traditionalists in Italy would voluntarily ingest many of the California wines he sold to rubes (TWA subscribers) under the guise of rating them.
As do others, I find your Champagne posts to be interesting. I also find your ad-hominem attacks of Kelley to reek of envy. Donāt be a knob. Thank you.
5 Likes
As I mentioned earlier in this topic, I thought Donaldās latest comments were veering into a far more reasonable place. Discussing and comparing critics, highlighting perceived flaws or weaknesses of them, and anointing favorites is tried and true subject matter for WB. Iām interested in this as I read reviewers and try to glean information from them. In the postings here Donald is trying really hard to discuss differences and (his) preferences, and leave off the random ad hominem attacks.
So I applaud the attempt, even if he isnāt right. Like many here, I read a lot of Donaldās posts with interest, and wonder at his commitment/need to work out his personal issues here as well as talk about wine. And I cheer even more to see William join in the discussion, explain his POV, his tastes and his approach. Argument becoming discussion is not the normal path for Internet boards. William expands his role to critic/interlocutor/psychoanalyst.
Funny side note. I recently got an offer from a wine retailer with quotes from Donaldās posts about the wines. Comical for a retailer to use another retailerās notes to sell wine. Next thing you know he will give up wine sales for criticism. 
5 Likes
Donald, you have at least twice referred to the problem here as being anglocentric wine criticism. I am not sure what you have against the English-speaking world, but I do wonder why you keep posting the same old arguments on an English language website. There are German wine websites out there. I know them. I speak German (Ich kenne sie. Ich spreche Deutsch).
So William Kelleyās palate doesnāt align with yours. Big deal. I think I speak for most of us here on the board when I say: Es ist uns allen Wurst. And that has nothing to do with sausage.
2 Likes
Guys, it could be worseā¦he could be advocating that champagne is best tasted on day 3, and that itās only good if it provides some sort of value / points per dollar after using some esoteric formula.
4 Likes
I couldnāt agree more. This was the one thing I didnāt agree with Josh about. He tried to meet each wine on itās terms, I think, and ended up highly scoring wines that Iām 95% sure he didnāt drink or buy himself. I think as long as you are open about where you are coming from (it comes out in the reviews anyway) then having a point of view is the best kind of criticism.
Donaldās posts only add to my skepticism about the usefulness of large language models (they arenāt true AI, so letās not call the that).
3 Likes
Donald, I appreciate most of your many posts on Champagne, but I donāt really get the point of this post. Unless you just want a computer to print out a chemical analysis of the wines, I donāt get how you canāt accept that all wine critics will necessarily have their own biases, perspectives, opinions, etc. I donāt think itās up to the wine the critic to eliminate all (reasonable) biases, rather itās up to consumer to decide how much he or she values the output of each critic.
2 Likes
I think perhaps Donald is an AI bot invented by Todd to post clickbait topics that boost his metrics and ad revenue.
2 Likes
Iām starting to suspect Donald read Don Quixote and, rather than a parody, interpreted it as a āhow toā manual. German windmills may not be safe for long.
1 Like
Things are getting interesting in WINE-BERSERKER Board recently - thanks to D.Deppen.
We have the thread which I named it as : The Burgundy Critics Brawl; and now this thread, May I name this as : The Champagne Critics Brawl.
I am going to get some pop corn,
2 Likes
Noā¦Otto : he is not trying to fool you.I believe Donald is pulling your legs as they say it in Englishā¦
Or in Chinese, I think : he is trying to stir the pot as that more and more people will get interest in wines and now Champagne - which ultimately his real goal and why not ?
Please remember : He is ITB.,
Whether his opinions are trust worthy or not, it is up the readers to decide - bearing in mind of what is in Chapter 81 of the Tao which I am an admirer. Please judge Donaldās comments freely,
My post and the text in Tao is not intend to offend anyone including to the OP).
Truthful words are not beautiful.
Beautiful words are not truthful.
He who knows does not speak.
He who does not know speaks.
He who is learned does not know.
He who is not leaned does speakā¦ .
6 Likes
Old Donald plays people here like Harpo played the harp drop a bomb on WK and everybody is shocked and appalled, a good tasting note or two on champagne and everybody respects him lol. While on Vinous he is a perfect gentleman with the occasional backhand slap about Berserkers. 
3 Likes
I do have to say that I love āBurgundian wine influenceā in my reviewers. I personally love Williamās take on Champagne. Miss Peter Liem however. He is around but not very popular anymore. I do like Brad Baker too.
3 Likes
People here get me wrong. I find the discussions here more stimulating than those on Vinous, but Antonio Galloni really surprised me with his champagne review. Sure, one can criticize Galloni for selling his reviews in advance, but on The Wine Advocate, they list shops and other locations where one can buy the wines, so I am not sure how that plays into things.
The problem is inherent in this post; one tries to have a reasoned debate and suddenly it is all about William Kelley. If William Kelley were Malfoy, then you have the importer Greg K jumping in as Goyle. I really like this phrase (as opposed to Maillard-derived smoke and mirrors), and this would be worthy of a discussion in itself.
Then there is the thing about my anglophobia. Since the catastrophe of 2016 and then the bigger catastrophe of the 31st of January 2020, I just cannot be objective about anything English, especially individuals deriving from those privileged backgrounds and ruining everything. It is with an intense feeling of schadenfreude that I watch that privileged class annihilate themselves and, sadly, bring down āplebsā like myself in their self-destruction.
A critic I also really like is the Wine King, and I am warming to Konstantin Baum despite his MW title. I just have to figure out how to integrate William Kelley authentically into the shops to benefit from the keywords, that is something for Chatgpt to do next year. But basically, Eichelmann, with his catholic taste as a critic, puts more bums on seats just as Bill Nanson is the best critic for selling Burgundy. Peter Leim for me is more of an educator. I really like Tyson Stelzer, the only one with the guts to call out Selosse, something neither Galloni or William Kelley has done.
3 Likes
Um, you yourself brought William Kelley up, right in your first post. The very first two words in your second sentence. I simply canāt fathom how you can first write a post about William Kelley and then accuse us how āit is all about William Kelleyā. This is just simply absurd, I feel weāve passed some kind of parody horizon now.
At I least I canāt take part in the discussion, because Iām just speechless. 
Way to generalize one thing a) that doesnāt even relate to the subject one little bit; b) and apply it to all the people in a certain group. This is just intellectual dishonesty at its best.
7 Likes