Hoke Harden wrote:
Bob, this type of calling out would only be useful if you made a point here to name the restaurant chain in question.
Simply complaining about high prices doesn’t achieve anything except allowing geeks to whinge.
But by naming the restaurant, there is at least a chance that a standing google search program will call up any post with the name of said chain in it.
Then you’ve possibly got the restaurant’s attention.
I agree that this probably won’t do much good. But it might.
And at least the right people would see it.
Also, as an explanation how this could happen (beyond basic stupid rapacity I mean), the prices are probably not set locally but nationally (or at least in the market where the national pricing manager resides). Thus they are based on prices in that market. If the pricing manager isn’t all that sophisticated, he might not be aware (or, yes, might not give a damn) that the prices in your restaurant seem ridiculously high. They might seem more reasonable where he is. Who knows.
And prices would be set, most likely, on the standard price of an item, or the price agreed upon by the seller and buyer in said major market, within an allowable +/- range. Prices in Oregon (a tertiary market for most big wine companies and chain restaurants) might be noticeably higher than, say, Chicago. This pricing model doesn’t take into account the off-premise chain promotions during the year (which can be significant).
It’s still rampant stupidity—especially since the two wines in question are both from Ste. Michelle/Stimson Lane, and they don’t like their wines being price disproportionate because it’s not in their best interest (as in this case)—but once they sell the wine they can’t control the price.
Again, doesn’t lessen the stupidity of this kind of pricing; just explains how it might happen.
Well, Hoke, thanks for the lecture, but if you’d bothered to read the linked thread about the meal you’d have gotten the whole story, including the name of the restaurant - and you could have spared yourself the high horse.
http://duckjuiceandduckbreasts.blogspot.com/> " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Well, it wasn’t meant as a lecture. Sorry you took it that way. And as to clicking on links, I’d say that it might be better to include the information in the original message rather than linking to somewhere else—since not everyone goes to links. Unless, that is, your intent in the post was merely to get us to read what you wrote somewhere else. Which is valid, but not at the time what I was interested in doing.
Again, my response wasn’t meant as a lecture, simply as a response to an interesting post, and an attempt to add additional information as to how these prices may be contrived in the first place from someone who was at one time very deeply involved in the process—and like you, marveling at the poor business acumen of the people in these chains. If you’re not interested in that information, fine. In my career I have all too often seen wine geeks whingeing to each other about pricing policies----but only to each other, never to the people who actually set the prices. That was the point I was clumsily attempting to make. No horses involved, high, low, or otherwise.
Wasn’t any need to get your underpants all bunched up.