Because the 89pts 1er Cru you describe is less good than the 93pts middle-of-the-pack Bdx. Fairly obvious, I think.
When you produce 2 barrels of a 1er Cru Burg you can‘t do the same investments and do the same vigorous selection as a 200k bottle middle-of-the-pack Bdx Chateau can.
Does anyone know if are a standard amount of 1.5L bottles in OWC? I’m thinking of loading up on large format bottles, specially Branaire-Ducru and Beau-Sejour Becot, and would like to keep them in wood packaging.
I don’t pay too much attention to raw scores, but I was under the impression that Burgundy has traditionally been scored much more conservatively compared to Bordeaux. The implication being that numerical comparisons like these aren’t exactly apples to apples. Do I have that wrong? (Don’t mean to hijack the thread or anything!)
I did backfill a ‘20 or ‘21 futures purchase a couple of months ago and they paid the reward when I bugged them after 45 days. Past performance is no guarantee of course.
It’s also a very unique wine withe the heavy Franc cepage and whole cluster ferments. It has been markedly improving now for over a decade since the Chapoutier winemaker started.
I am just now in Bordeaux and I have met a few owners & chateau managers who tell me that outside of the obvious top-scored names the EP sales are not going as well as producers were hoping for. So many of those who haven’t released prices yet are having to reconsider how aggressive they will dare to be. Negociants are being pretty tough in the negotiations, apparently.
My short answer is no, it’s not. Pricing aside, I think if you look at the bulk of the wines, the barrel ratings are between 89-96. That’s not historic. 2021 followed the same pattern.
Further to this, I understand that whole cluster acts to lower acidity. If that’s the case, what is LCHB doing to get such a relatively low ph compared to others that do not use whole cluster (e.g., HB and LMHB)?