Big changes at the Wine Advocate- Parker reportedly cashes out and gives up editorial control

Someone offered me $100 for the domain name many months ago - I wonder if Goldman Sachs was behind it?? [snort.gif]

Neal wrote “I had a chat with Bob on Friday and I have to say, I am very excited about the plans for the TWA.”

No word from Antonio yet. To me, that is the big issue. If he goes back out on his own, I will switch my subscription dollars there. So Antonio, if you are reading here . . .

That was the point I was trying to make. It’s hard to get to a price that’s materially better for Parker than the current arrangement unless you have a new vision for the business/brand that will see a bit increase in the top line.

So did Mr Parker cash out just before tax rates jump? Good for him!

Kevin… if I have to guess : hitsfan

In any event, they will be positioned to grow with this regional market, as its already-increasing affluence multiplies. All those Chinese foreign exchange reserves chasing assets. [wow.gif]

Still, RMP was able to cash out of a business that was in decline (based on subscription count estimates only) and likely for a sick amount of money, while still staying on board as a paid Chairman. Smart.

The WA founder got mad at me a few years ago, when I wrote that he was a good businessman. Methinks he did protest too much.

I would very much guess that he was out-maneuvered. I am sure that AG is a very unhappy camper at the moment, unless he got handsomely rewarded for his minority stake in the business, which is unlikely.

Remember, he was a banker, so he should understand the notion that the highest bidder wins.

Enough about Parker! There, I’ve provided the obligatory complaint. Carry on.

That was a rumor started in NYC. I recently met him at villa d’este for the first time and he seemed quite capable. I hope he is a part of the new regime. That goes for Neal as well.

It doesn’t make losing a big deal that you staked your life and career on any easier.

From the way it reads, Antonio is potentially the biggest loser in this. He has gone from “heir apparent” and seeking investors to buy out Parker to now a paid employee who will be under much greater editorial control.

Pure speculation, John, but one wonders if Galloni had, in essence, an option to secure financing and cash Parker out within a certain time period and did not get the job done. Given what is publicly known of Galloni’s work and travel schedule, one would have to wonder if he had the time for dealmaking, too. This looks like the work of bankers, and perhaps driven by fiscal cliff paranoia. Interestingly, the Dragon Lady has a banker in the family, according to her bio:

“In November 2002 Perrotti-Brown left London for Tokyo, where her husband, a banker, had been transferred.”

Martin is part of the new enterprise:

“I’m very happy about the move, it’s exciting both for myself and The Wine Advocate,” Martin told the drinks business.

“It means we can upgrade the website, conduct more tasting events and expand the readership in the Far East,” he added.

Kevin, does your first sentence refer to Neal? You needed to meet him to consider him capable? For/at what?

Her husband is a banker, but IIRC wasn’t with Goldman-Sachs.

Well, KFC is still doing pretty well post-Colonel :wink:

What an original thought!

http://www.wineberserkers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1038324#p1038324


[cheers.gif]

The new owners also have no experience either in wine or in publishing: Parker says that they’re “young visionaries” in the financial-services and IT fields,

Look out Eric, here comes “My Wines”… neener

Sorry Ken, hadn’t gotten that far down the thread. Great minds, and all that :wink: