Eric, thanks so much for posting the TN.
…except…
Gawd! O-o-o-o-o-h No-o-o-o-o-o-o-o! The horse has risen to be beaten yet again!
Your TN of 20 December 2007 in the link above was indeed for the L054 JUNG bottling, and said, “…Wow, this is great stuff! Stupendous wine that has it all with an extra oomph, very dynamic, vibrant, white pepper, funk, power and vibrancy. … Hands down the favorite wine for each taster. 97 points.”
My TN was from three days earlier, 17 December 2007, on a bottle from the same lot:
-
2003 Clos des Papes Châteauneuf-du-Pape - France, Rhône, Southern Rhône, Châteauneuf-du-Pape (12/17/2007)
Given the controversy I decided to open the first of these tonight. Color is a lightish ruby. Nose was muted on opening and has remained so for four hours… actually, I’m getting less from it right now than before. I find garrigue, red cherry… I am biased by so many TNs that I might think I find a hint of reductive or scorched aromas. No raisons / prunes on the nose, nothing chemical. The palate is light-bodied, and, amazingly, seems to taste of very little. A bit of fruity sweetness makes a mild impression. No raisons, etc. Fairly hollow middle. An unremarkable touch of heat. Brief finish. If I had this blind I’d say a nice enough Cotes du Rhone. Given what it is I say it’s closed (man, I sure hope so!) All things considered it gets 88 points for its showing tonight. Lord knows what will happen in the future. (88 pts.)
Posted from CellarTracker
I read the posts on The Other Board back then, and there were grand arguments about bottle vatiation vs. palate variation. Lots of compelling arguments each way.
But there is no way – no way, do you hear me, no way! – that palate preference explains the difference in our TNs of three days apart on wine from the same lot. I simply do not believe it possible. There is too much overlap in our CellarTracker TNs on other wines we’ve both reported on to explain our discrepancies on this one. And for the record, I purchased the wine on futures from the Wine House in Los Angeles, and put it in the temp-controlled storage locker immediately on delivery which, as CT informs me, was 25 September 2005.
I’ll still go with the idea that it was closed, and yours was somehow open for business. Go figure.
OK, I’ll stop now. I’ll leave it to others to flog away at will.
Though I’d still love to see a recent TN on this bottling!