An issue of principle among friends..? (poll!)

At the risk of being classist, I also think age and economic circumstances come into play. At my age and given my great good fortune, I can afford not to sweat the small stuff. I would much rather let it pass than have any lingering resentments. I would rather pick up the dinner tab then have people argue about who had the more expensive app. But I would definitely have looked at this sort of thing differently in my salad days.

King Solomon should cancel the deal and make things as they were. A can then ponder what to do with the cabinet. B-G can ponder what to get for house-warming gifts. Maybe a deal will ensue.

-Al

A is married. A single guy wouldn’t care.

Anyhow, I already told you that A is Fu.

It would not have made a difference to me if it was $5,000. The only thing that would have made a difference is if A thought that B was buying it for his own use and wanted to give him the discount almost as a gift. But since A knew B and C were giving it away, it just became a matter of how much A wanted to get back for it. He got that amount and it does not matter what the actual $ figure was.

The fact that B and C were not so generous as to split the cost just between themselves, but included 4 others in the gift to the ultimate recipient should be totally irrelevant from A’s standpoint.

BTW - the thread title could easily have been An issue of principal among friends. Most times when someone says it is an issue of principle, its really an issue of principal. [cheers.gif]

Lol. I’m friend H. Also A and B are single yes. Not sure how that changes things. Should I have put that in to further complicate it? [snort.gif]

A and B are single?

Well with their ridiculous attitudes, it’s no wonder. [snort.gif]

+1. That is how I would feel if I had gotten rid of the cabinet.

That’s how I would look at it if I were A. I’d be pissed if B flipped the cabinet for a higher amount, thus taking a sale away from me, but I wouldn’t be upset about having others share in the discount. Especially considering that (1) there was already at least one other person was involved and (2) B seems to have communicated that this was going to be gifted away. Once he made the offer, the fact that B extended the favor to others should be immaterial.

Frankly, if I were A, I don’t know I would have even offered the discount in that situation. If B wanted it for himself, then sure, I’d cut him a break. If I knew that he was giving it away, I think that would have changed my opinion. It seems like it’s the ultimate recipient that’s benefiting from this, after all B could have spent the same amount on a different gift. If I didn’t know that recipient, then I don’t think I would have come down from my original price.