Citing the Type 29 to characterize Saab’s aeronautical legacy is pretty silly. I could mention the Draken or Grippen, but the Viggen was really its signature, and the only plane to get a confirmed radar lock on an SR-71…and in once case provide a defensive escort. Finally declassified: Swedish pilots awarded US Air Medals for saving SR-71 spy plane
Right, and I’m one of them. However, one who can afford a 3 hour experience can most certainly afford a decent pair of shoes that he can wear 8-12 hours a day for 3+ days a week for 30-50 years. And think about how many friends you might have had if you had a handsome pair of well made shoes… FWIW, I got my first pair of real shoes 10 years ago second hand on eBay for $60. Still wear them today. But I do spend less than $20k on wine per year.
Clearly the focus on this part of my comment is hitting too close to home with the marked up, square toed shoe wearers out there
While there are some magnificently funny moments- I think Sideways fails as a film for one fundamental reason. It is too depressing. It is just one wave of bad news after another without enough comedic relief to balance it out. Some of the saddest plays and films also have hysterically funny moments for a reason.
Sorry this thread had to mix two topics, back to Fort Ross…
We were on the Sonoma Coast two weeks ago, really the middle of nowhere north of Jenner, far from “wine country.” A little wooden sign at a crossroads said “Wine Tasting” and we headed up into the hills to explore. Not much of a story after that, we found Fort Ross, buzzed at the gate and were told tastings were by appointment only, so we missed the chance. I assumed it was a random low level estate, only later did I find out it was Jeff Pisoni’s project…I might have begged harder to get in. It was the only winery for miles around.
Really liked the movie. Better yet, is if you can find the commentary by Giammati & Church that was released on the DVD. They are funny guys together.
I owned a Saab (93 Aero) which was a really great car for a while and almost always a pleasure to drive. Drove well above it’s weight class. Electronics were finicky once the car reached an age, but the engine was sweet as a nut and the car handled well. As far as I’m aware, despite their wild advertising for a decade or two, Saab never actually built any engines for their planes. They used BMW, Rolls & Boeing I believe. Great fake advertising though.
Never heard of of had the wine on topic.
The Saab’s coolness has been lost to time. There were a few years in the early ‘90’s when I had a red and a green Saab 900S. They got way more attention from folks than any BMW I ever owned. In their day, they were cool. Today they look like a dinosaur.
I haven’t seen Beanpole, but Russian cinema has a long history. It includes some funny comedies. But a lot of the most famous serious films are quite dark. American cinema largely reflects a view that most things will probably turn out okay in the end, Russian cinema is pretty certain that it won’t and, after all, what did you expect.
We could all live on the cheap and redistribute a good deal of our annual income every year to those less fortunate if we just agreed to give up all luxury goods, comrade.
The important movies are always serious and dark. It’s like saying American cinema is dark and serious since comedies don’t win the awards. When Russians make references to Russian cinema, it’s quite often to the comedies they watch, of which there are plenty. If I have to listen to another fucking quote from S Lechkim Parom… Anyway.
There’s no doubt that there is a fair amount of Russian cinema that’s dark and brooding, but that’s also the stuff that gets shown abroad, since that’s the stuff made with art in mind. Comedies translate much worse and aren’t being made for external consumption.
I like S Lechkim Parom, but not sure I’d want to watch it every New Year’s Eve. It’s also quite accessible to a Western audience. I loaned it to an admin at work and she and her daughter (watched separately) loved it.