A contrary take on a simple red Burgundy

Really, you must have a wine-buddy who will open a good bottle of Burgundy with a reasonable pile of years on it. If not, I’d give you access to my cellar, such as it is, though we are out in the sticks here a bit.

+1, well said. :slight_smile:

Kevin, thanks for starting this thought-provoking thread. I’m relatively new to Burgundy, but find myself getting sucked deeper and deeper by the day. I seriously don’t doubt you hit a lackluster wine that totally under-delivered for the price. I know red Burgundy can have “dumb phases”, although I think they are greatly over exaggerated by most people. When we look at where prices have gone over the past decade, it’s rather disheartening to say the least. That said, I’ve found that I’m much happier buying smaller numbers of upper tier bottles than I am with more low-end offerings. As an example, I thoroughly enjoyed a recent bottle of 2010 Vincent Girardin Corton-Charlemagne. It’s certainly not cheap at $90-$100 a bottle, but I had zero regrets on splurging on a bottle after I had my first taste. In bottles that I’ve personally purchased, the really memorable reds were '93 Millot Echézeaux and '97 Drouhin Clos St. Denis. I can’t say I’d purchase these at current release prices, but if you can ever find GC Côte-d’Or for under $100, I would highly recommend snagging a test bottle.
:slight_smile:

Sadly, I don’t know anyone who cellars Burgundy (or much else other than California wines I don’t drink). But I’d be happy to open some good Italian wines in exchange!

Abandon hope!

Not really, but it’d be worth your while to retain a certified financial adviser to monitor your spending. [cheers.gif]

Deal.

For me, as a gross generalization, I get better value in Oregon Pinot up to about $70, at that point the scales tip in favor of Burgundy.

Kevin - The Italian for French deal might be OK as long as it is 3:1 in favor of the Italian. Beware of those bearing Burgundy as gifts.

merci…Howard [cheers.gif] grouphug