If their birthday is in the first half of the year, go for the year of their conception!
The 1973 Baumard Quarts de Chaume or one of the Lopez de Heredia Riojas would be singing.
You may be beter off starting a new thread and getting a whole other set of replies. But jus tquickly… 1964 is my favorite old vintage Barolo. For me, leaps and bounds better than others mentioned as good years (e.g. 1967). I’ve had good bottles from producers that people forgot about years ago. Just remember to stand the wines up for 2 weeks+ (or ideally decant from a cradle) and give them air (google the Chambers decanting instructions, and as noted above, they sell a lot of older Barolo including 1964).
Sorry to be a downer but you’re not getting a ‘74 Maya for the price you are willing to spend. Sterling (reserve) is the way to go in terms of price point and quality.
I would also suggest to be a little malleable in terms of year…I totally get the desire to hit a birth year but it’s been my experience that close enough and a great wine experience trumps a number. Intent and hustle matters and a friend will be blown away by no matter what year the wine is. Opening up an old bottle of wine is like opening a time capsule and hopefully you all get a chance to forget about the current hellscape and recall wonderful e periences/moments. The wine ends up being a facilitator and prop for this. Please don’t get hung up on hitting a specific vintage. I promise you it truly doesn’t matter.
I really think when non-geek friends (and I’m assuming that’s the case, because geeks know what to look for) are looking for a birthyear wine, it truly does matter. They are not looking for a great wine experience, they are looking for a wine that marks their 50th. I’m a 1960 , so fine with averaging a 59 and 61 Bordeaux to equal. But when non wine geeks friends have their birthday what is meaningful is I open their birthyear (68 Rioja, 64 Rioja or Piedmont, 63 Port etc-). And especially with a year with lots of great possibilities why not just do birthyear? Older bottles can be unpredictable, storage matters. But with $500 limit I’d get two bottles, Sterling or Mondavi regular (each only a step behind reserve- I’ve had both in last decade that showed well) or something like Marcarini or a Produttori single vineyard, Better to source separately to increase odds
Wasn’t Togni at Cuvaison in '74?? There is very little talk about his stretch there. I had a friend who worked with him there then. He always wondered if he would live long enough to enjoy the cabs PT made.
Charles Krug Vintage select, mostly from the See Ranch, was excellent that year.
The problem with 1974 is that once you leave Napa and northern Italy, there is not much too choose from. Simi is a great idea. Burgundy, Bordeaux, Germany…no…northern Rhone? I remember the 74 Guigal Cote Rotie as being great in the early 80s…now?? There were lots of great Napa wines that year, but the prices…
Good point. The sentiment over a birth year wine is great. It’s a fun thing to do. But, I’d caution putting too much expectation in it. With wine that old, a particular bottle of a great wine can be a total flop. So, it’s a good idea to have backup bottles or some other sort of hedging.