Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Now we can argue whether or not Rhys actually was treated differently than KJ (or Foley) would have been in the same situation.
https://www.pressdemocrat.com/business/ ... executives
https://www.pressdemocrat.com/business/ ... executives
Michael Beckman
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Also this looks to be bigger much in scale than what Rhys did, apart from the illegal storage of water there were no rights to.
Michael Beckman
- larry schaffer
- BerserkerBusiness
- Posts: 7741
- Joined: January 28th, 2009, 9:26 am
- Location: Santa Ynez Valley, CA
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Thank you for posting this. And it should be really interesting to watch. A lot more drama in this than appears on the surface, as this guy had been president of Foley and stepped away just as these charges were being filed.
Note that it took over two years for the information to come out about Rhys, and that we didn't hear anything about it until the fines were announced.
Why are we hearing about this so quickly? That is the question.
Note that it took over two years for the information to come out about Rhys, and that we didn't hear anything about it until the fines were announced.
Why are we hearing about this so quickly? That is the question.
larry schaffer
tercero wines
tercero wines
-
- GCC Member
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: January 24th, 2014, 11:07 pm
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Interesting, and yet this report leaves out so much.
Two data points though - this combined with the Rhys penalty/reporting (very similar language and issues) indicate something. Noise? Coincidence? Or does this reflect energetic new leadership at the water board(s) in CA. Trying to make names for themselves or more a ‘holy crap look what people have been getting away with! Let’s make some big examples and get growers to take these laws more seriously’ moment?
Two data points though - this combined with the Rhys penalty/reporting (very similar language and issues) indicate something. Noise? Coincidence? Or does this reflect energetic new leadership at the water board(s) in CA. Trying to make names for themselves or more a ‘holy crap look what people have been getting away with! Let’s make some big examples and get growers to take these laws more seriously’ moment?
Rich Frankel
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Here is the report, there seems to be a hefty dose of deceit throughout, and the images look bad.R. Frankel wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 10:03 amInteresting, and yet this report leaves out so much.
Two data points though - this combined with the Rhys penalty/reporting (very similar language and issues) indicate something. Noise? Coincidence? Or does this reflect energetic new leadership at the water board(s) in CA. Trying to make names for themselves or more a ‘holy crap look what people have been getting away with! Let’s make some big examples and get growers to take these laws more seriously’ moment?
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoa ... Report.pdf
Not sure about if it is a coincidence, but I had heard people talking as if the pressure was off in recent years from regulators after the fires as there was so much to deal with. Maybe the enforcement arm is catching up on everything they saw happening but couldn't pursue? Repeated satellite imagery seems to have played a big part in both Rhys and now this investigation.
Michael Beckman
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Former head of KJ and Foley, no way he can say he didn't know. Especially since his business is developing vineyards.Given Mr. Reimers has had experience in developing vineyards in Sonoma County, he should be aware of required Vineyard Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (VESCO) permits through SCACO.
G . T a t a r
[i]"the incorrect overuse of apostrophes is staggering these days. I wonder if half the adults these days have any idea what they are for." Chris Seiber, 5/14/19[/i]
[i]"the incorrect overuse of apostrophes is staggering these days. I wonder if half the adults these days have any idea what they are for." Chris Seiber, 5/14/19[/i]
- Neal.Mollen
- GCC Member
- Posts: 33982
- Joined: January 30th, 2009, 1:26 pm
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Interesting that the CA agency's web address is "waterboards," which I would have thought conjured a less-than-savory image
I don't have to speak; she defends me
A drunkard's dream if I ever did see one
A drunkard's dream if I ever did see one
- Dave McIsaac
- BerserkerDay Champion
- Posts: 3643
- Joined: November 29th, 2010, 1:13 pm
- Location: Hudson, Ohio
- Brian Tuite
- GCC Member
- Posts: 19270
- Joined: July 3rd, 2010, 8:53 am
- Location: Podunk CA
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Wow, just wow!mbeckman wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 10:21 am
Here is the report, there seems to be a hefty dose of deceit throughout, and the images look bad.
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoa ... Report.pdf
Bob Wood - 1949-2013 Berserker for eternity! RIP
"On self-reflection, I think a big part of it was me just being a PITA customer..." ~ Anonymous Berserker
"Something so subtle only I can detect it." ~ Randy Bowman
2019 WOTY...
"On self-reflection, I think a big part of it was me just being a PITA customer..." ~ Anonymous Berserker
"Something so subtle only I can detect it." ~ Randy Bowman
2019 WOTY...
-
- GCC Member
- Posts: 3626
- Joined: January 29th, 2009, 3:54 am
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Looks like at least a few thousands times the impact of the Rhys project, so I assume the fine will be in the billions, right?
ITB - Useless lackey
"I've acquired enough wine to seduce an elephant." - Jennifer Robin
"I've acquired enough wine to seduce an elephant." - Jennifer Robin
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Now what did I do?
T*R*U*E*T*T
- P@u1_M3nk3s
- GCC Member
- Posts: 1506
- Joined: June 7th, 2009, 2:14 pm
- Location: El Cerrito CA
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
I didn’t see it mentioned but the Rhys violations impacted a designated “wild and scenic river”, the undammed Eel river. Does that affect the fine amount?
Cheers,
Paul
Paul
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
This thread isn't legit until Alan posts.
s t e w @ r t
- Alan Rath
- GCC Member
- Posts: 18970
- Joined: April 24th, 2009, 12:45 am
- Location: Bay Area, CA. Sometimes out to lunch.
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
If he does, I'll be impressed. And a little frightened ![wow [wow.gif]](./images/smilies/wow.gif)
![wow [wow.gif]](./images/smilies/wow.gif)
I'm just one lost soul, swimming in a fish bowl, year after year
- Dave McIsaac
- BerserkerDay Champion
- Posts: 3643
- Joined: November 29th, 2010, 1:13 pm
- Location: Hudson, Ohio
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Well, I suppose you referring to yourself in the 3rd person was only inevitable

![[neener.gif] neener](./images/smilies/neener.gif)
s t e w @ r t
- Alan Rath
- GCC Member
- Posts: 18970
- Joined: April 24th, 2009, 12:45 am
- Location: Bay Area, CA. Sometimes out to lunch.
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Ha, if I'm going to refer to myself, it will be the royal we
![bow [bow.gif]](./images/smilies/bow.gif)
I'm just one lost soul, swimming in a fish bowl, year after year
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
And we totally understand (or not) ![berserker [berserker.gif]](./images/smilies/berserker.gif)
![berserker [berserker.gif]](./images/smilies/berserker.gif)
s t e w @ r t
- D@vid Bu3ker
- GCC Member
- Posts: 33505
- Joined: February 14th, 2009, 8:06 am
- Location: Connecticut
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Impacted is a stretch, even in reading the report.P@u1_M3nk3s wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 4:58 pmI didn’t see it mentioned but the Rhys violations impacted a designated “wild and scenic river”, the undammed Eel river. Does that affect the fine amount?
David Bueker - Rieslingfan
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Thank you for not explaining the joke, which by the way was a good one.
“You need to look down to the bottom shelf where they keep the Fighting Cock” — Corey N.
C. Gle@son
C. Gle@son
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
“We meant to do that.”Neal.Mollen wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 10:50 amInteresting that the CA agency's web address is "waterboards," which I would have thought conjured a less-than-savory image
“You need to look down to the bottom shelf where they keep the Fighting Cock” — Corey N.
C. Gle@son
C. Gle@son
- Randy Bowman
- GCC Member
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: January 27th, 2009, 2:23 pm
- Location: Napa, CA
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Over the years, certain violations that weren't so easily visible were common. Easier to beg forgiveness than to get permission. A person could spend years and thousands of dollars to remove a tree only to have a neighbor or the Sierra Club take it to the supreme court. When you are caught, it's obvious you can't return the property and trees to their original state. So a hefty fine is in order and that fine is probably cheaper than obtaining permission and fighting environmentalists.
This report is pretty comprehensive. Should be a real big fine, plus heavy expenses to obtain permits. The vineyard is now a viable way to protect the disturbed land. I doubt they will be required to replant trees, clear channels etc., and be denied permission to plant grape vines.
This report is pretty comprehensive. Should be a real big fine, plus heavy expenses to obtain permits. The vineyard is now a viable way to protect the disturbed land. I doubt they will be required to replant trees, clear channels etc., and be denied permission to plant grape vines.
IN THE BUSINESS SHILL: An associate of a person selling goods, who pretends no association to the seller and assumes the air of an enthusiastic customer.
- P@u1_M3nk3s
- GCC Member
- Posts: 1506
- Joined: June 7th, 2009, 2:14 pm
- Location: El Cerrito CA
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
Whatever your preferred phrasing, the Eel is a designated wild and scenic river. The report states these violations occurred partially within the Eel’s watershed. The topic of this thread deals with violations on a river that is not designated wild and scenic. Does the finding of violations on a designated wild and scenic watershed increase the severity?D@vid Bu3ker wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 6:47 pmImpacted is a stretch, even in reading the report.P@u1_M3nk3s wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 4:58 pmI didn’t see it mentioned but the Rhys violations impacted a designated “wild and scenic river”, the undammed Eel river. Does that affect the fine amount?
Cheers,
Paul
Paul
-
- GCC Member
- Posts: 3626
- Joined: January 29th, 2009, 3:54 am
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
True. But, also, with Rhys violation showed the reckless shortcutting with the road construction had the potential to put the watershed at great risk, had there been a major storm event. It also showed actual erosion being immediately captured. My reading is the size of that fine relates to how unacceptable putting that watershed at risk is. Seems appropriate.P@u1_M3nk3s wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 8:22 pmWhatever your preferred phrasing, the Eel is a designated wild and scenic river. The report states these violations occurred partially within the Eel’s watershed. The topic of this thread deals with violations on a river that is not designated wild and scenic. Does the finding of violations on a designated wild and scenic watershed increase the severity?D@vid Bu3ker wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 6:47 pmImpacted is a stretch, even in reading the report.P@u1_M3nk3s wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 4:58 pmI didn’t see it mentioned but the Rhys violations impacted a designated “wild and scenic river”, the undammed Eel river. Does that affect the fine amount?
This case is quite different. Much greater area. Massive erosion. Reckless damage. Massive actual damage to the watershed. The spirit of doing that scale of a project without permitting is in a different league. The repeated lying to regulators is intolerable. In a fair world this guy will do prison time and have his personal wealth stripped by the fines.
ITB - Useless lackey
"I've acquired enough wine to seduce an elephant." - Jennifer Robin
"I've acquired enough wine to seduce an elephant." - Jennifer Robin
- P@u1_M3nk3s
- GCC Member
- Posts: 1506
- Joined: June 7th, 2009, 2:14 pm
- Location: El Cerrito CA
Re: Water quality agency claims vintner’s business improperly cleared Cloverdale land
It will be interesting, to say the least, what penalties the water board will assess.Wes Barton wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 9:24 pmTrue. But, also, with Rhys violation showed the reckless shortcutting with the road construction had the potential to put the watershed at great risk, had there been a major storm event. It also showed actual erosion being immediately captured. My reading is the size of that fine relates to how unacceptable putting that watershed at risk is. Seems appropriate.P@u1_M3nk3s wrote: ↑August 13th, 2019, 8:22 pmWhatever your preferred phrasing, the Eel is a designated wild and scenic river. The report states these violations occurred partially within the Eel’s watershed. The topic of this thread deals with violations on a river that is not designated wild and scenic. Does the finding of violations on a designated wild and scenic watershed increase the severity?
This case is quite different. Much greater area. Massive erosion. Reckless damage. Massive actual damage to the watershed. The spirit of doing that scale of a project without permitting is in a different league. The repeated lying to regulators is intolerable. In a fair world this guy will do prison time and have his personal wealth stripped by the fines.
Cheers,
Paul
Paul