A few months ago, I got a bottle of 2020 Favia Chardonnay Carbone as part of the Wine Access Michelin club. It’s hard to stress how unlikely a purchase that would have been for me.
The only professional review I could find out there was for the original vintage in 2018 from Kim Marcus in Wine Spectator:
Fresh and juicy, with green apple and pear pastry flavors that feature hints of lemon verbena. The gauzy finish is rich and well-spiced. Drink now through 2023.
SCORE > 89
For context that’s one point below the score Kim gave in Napa to the basic Duckhorn and the Groth Hillview that same vintage. It’s the same score he gave in Sonoma to the La Crema Sonoma Coast and the Ernest & Julio Gallo RRV that vintage. So suffice it to say I wasn’t too excited about having the 2020 version, even if his description sounded better than his actual score.
Thinking I’d get it out of the way, I opened it. And, I actually liked it a lot. Here’s my CT note:
2020 Favia Chardonnay Carbone > - USA, California, Napa Valley, Coombsville (4/9/2022)
Crisp aromas of lemon, light-colored flowers and Spring rain. Flavors of green apple, herbs, and citrus. Outstanding balance. Almost unnoticeable, judiciously restrained use of oak. Zesty acids. I would do with this Chardonnay something I rarely do with any California Chardonnay, I would buy it again.ABV: 14.2%
Standrad cork. > (94 pts.)
Apparently the key to Favia’s Carbone Chard is that they harvest early and prevent malolactic fermentation, though they do use oak barrels (some percentage new) to ferment the juice and keep it on lees for 8 months. (That’s a link to their notes.)
This isn’t Chablis. The word that comes to mind is juicy (Kim was right about that), like a Mosel Riesling. Their notes say it’s a wine meant for immediate consumption, not aging. Though I don’t see why a few years would do it any harm.
Has anyone else had this? Are there other Chards like this (maybe better somehow)?