https://www.frw.co.uk/editorial/people/ ... ivier-lamy
Still not sure how best to get all that wax off old bottles so I can use a Durand though
![[swearing.gif] [swearing.gif]](./images/smilies/swearing.gif)
I’d imagine it’d have the effect of slowing down the ageing curve on the wine.
The real question is whether it provides any more 'protection then an aluminum foil - and hownmuch more than without anything at all.
Apparently PYCM as well. The effect may be marginal, but I like the idea of this measure working in concert with multiple other lines of defense
Preferences are a funny thing, I actually prefer the brittler waxes. Makes a mess, but at least I can get all or most of it off to access the cork. The softer waxes just stick to everything. I've had a couple that just completely coated the worm of my corkscrew and wouldn't go away.Todd Hamina wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 7:34 am For me it depends on the wax (hate the brittle type that is messy), and I use a big knife to cut through it.
While Olivier Lamy only gave Gavin only two wines to sample, we don’t know the extent of his research into closures and premox. The article made it sound like Lamy has conducted quite a few experiments with closures. That said, I agree with you that as of now this is anecdotal at best, and more research needs to be done (or at least shared by Lamy if he has the extensive tests results) to be able conclude anything meaningful about wax and its effects on premox. I think you’d need a much bigger sample size in order to conclude anything with any statistical significance. I’d love to know if he has more detailed data on his tests and if he has conducted any type of statistical analysis on it.larry schaffer wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 7:54 am Interesting article - but I'm not sure that wax creates an anti-oxidative environment, anymore so than an aluminum capsules does. I cannot find any information that says so.
It would be intersting to have his hypothesis tested - otherwise, this is simply anecdotal at best.
Cheers.
It most certainly does. The aluminum foil is just pressed there, it's not sealed airproof. Furthermore, the top is often perforated with two small holes so that it can be inserted with more ease around the bottle neck. It offers no protection whatsoever against oxygen, it only protects the cork from physical harm and reduces possibilities of tampering with the cork going unnoticed.larry schaffer wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 8:14 am The real question is whether it provides any more 'protection then an aluminum foil - and hownmuch more than without anything at all.
But a wax is just a class of compounds right, and you can make waxes with different specs, no? So if indeed his wax has been a perfect seal, then why not screwcaps or anything else that would make such a seal, like maybe shrink-wrap capsules.larry schaffer wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 7:54 am Interesting article - but I'm not sure that wax creates an anti-oxidative environment, anymore so than an aluminum capsules does. I cannot find any information that says so.
It would be intersting to have his hypothesis tested - otherwise, this is simply anecdotal at best.
Cheers.
Otto,Otto Forsberg wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 8:57 amIt most certainly does. The aluminum foil is just pressed there, it's not sealed airproof. Furthermore, the top is often perforated with two small holes so that it can be inserted with more ease around the bottle neck. It offers no protection whatsoever against oxygen, it only protects the cork from physical harm and reduces possibilities of tampering with the cork going unnoticed.larry schaffer wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 8:14 am The real question is whether it provides any more 'protection then an aluminum foil - and hownmuch more than without anything at all.
However, a wax creates a somewhat airproof seal around the mouth of the bottle - although since the wax probably isn't fully impermeable to oxygen, it doesn't offer complete protection (and there is some air always trapped within the cork as well). Nevertheless, unless the wax is chipped so that the cork is exposed, it actually offers at least some kind of seal against oxygen, unlike the foil.
Please do not wax your bottles. I'm still in the "hate them" camp.larry schaffer wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 2:35 pmOtto,Otto Forsberg wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 8:57 amIt most certainly does. The aluminum foil is just pressed there, it's not sealed airproof. Furthermore, the top is often perforated with two small holes so that it can be inserted with more ease around the bottle neck. It offers no protection whatsoever against oxygen, it only protects the cork from physical harm and reduces possibilities of tampering with the cork going unnoticed.larry schaffer wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 8:14 am The real question is whether it provides any more 'protection then an aluminum foil - and hownmuch more than without anything at all.
However, a wax creates a somewhat airproof seal around the mouth of the bottle - although since the wax probably isn't fully impermeable to oxygen, it doesn't offer complete protection (and there is some air always trapped within the cork as well). Nevertheless, unless the wax is chipped so that the cork is exposed, it actually offers at least some kind of seal against oxygen, unlike the foil.
It would be interesting to 'test' your hypothesis by including both a waxed and foiled bottle and follow them over time. You are most likely correct - but if wax really is permeable as well, my guess is that the difference in oxygen ingress between the two will be minute over a period of years.
Cheers.
Definitely, although I suppose the aluminum foil really doesn't make any difference. If the foil is perforated, it offers no protection whatsoever against oxygen, since air can move freely around the bottle lip and cork end. Un-perforated foil might offer a little bit of protection, since it's choked around the slightly wider bulge around the bottle neck close to the lip. However, even though aluminum is 100% impermeable to oxygen, I doubt that even un-perforated aluminum foil protects much from oxygen, since you can't make an air-proof seal just by pressing aluminum foil against glass.larry schaffer wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 2:35 pm It would be interesting to 'test' your hypothesis by including both a waxed and foiled bottle and follow them over time. You are most likely correct - but if wax really is permeable as well, my guess is that the difference in oxygen ingress between the two will be minute over a period of years.
Cheers.
That's the one I was referring to earlier. Anyone in school here that can read that paper for free and give us the highlights?Otto Forsberg wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 3:02 pmlarry schaffer wrote: ↑January 12th, 2021, 2:35 pm It would be interesting to 'test' your hypothesis by including both a waxed and foiled bottle and follow them over time. You are most likely correct - but if wax really is permeable as well, my guess is that the difference in oxygen ingress between the two will be minute over a period of years.
Cheers.
I agree with you in that if wax is permeable to oxygen, I suppose it will have only quite minute effect - especially with extended aging. However, for example this abstract for a research on wax permeability suggests that the oxygen permeability through wax is very minuscule, suggesting that it might actually limit oxygen ingress more than marginally.