While on the topic, I can add a few positive data points. I opened three 2011 Fevre Grand Crus - Vaudesir, Preuses, and Clos this past weekend for some friends. They were all excellent. Still fresh, youthful, and structured. Lots of life left in them and no signs of premature aging. As good as they were, I’d even say they were too young, or I’d prefer them with some more age at least. The Vaudesir was probably the most ready.
Also, not Chablis, but we opened a 2011 Bouchard Corton Charlemagne which was also excellent. Bigger, richer, and showier than the Chablis, but also fresh and full of life.
Not. My storage is perfect, and bottles purchased when they arrived from the Dauvisat distributor. It’s a premox issue, with all the factors that play into the phenomenon of premox. Imperfect storage is a possible factor, but one of the lesser issues.
Had the 2011 Fevre Prueses today and had a similar take. Was hoping the 2011 would be much further along the development curve. Do wines under Diam eventually reach full maturity you just have to wait longer?
I like that! Maybe I should have said much less mature than all of the 2011 Dauvissat I have had, which hasn’t shown very well for the vintage. Need to find more Fevre!
I found this article quite interesting. I note that a recent purchase of Chablis from Pattes Loup was under a waxed capsule (lovely wine by the way). Jim