What a pleasant surprise this old magnum proved to be, with charcuterie, cavatelli and NY strip steak at a local Italian restaurant, a posto.
Very healthy fill at bottom neck and a quick decant. I believe this is 70 merlot/30 cab franc, which yielded a quite savory and earthy nose. My wife, whose nose is way better than mine, immediately announced “tobacco!” Also coffee, meat and blood. The fruit profile was a rather subdued compote, but the wine is not at all “stewed”. At the age of 34 the tannins have obviously mellowed, but plenty of grip remains. Long finish. In mag form this wine has plenty of life left.
This wine is manly and decidedly unsexy. I found this to be a refreshing antithesis of what is frequently derided as the modern gloopy St E. 93
Shared desserts were a treat as well with a bottle of 1988 Lafaurie-Peyraguey sauternes. Color of very light copper. Like the bordeaux, not at all a blockbuster, but rather a mellowing, honeyed, waxy elixir that just lingers on the palate. Sweetness receding. Classic pineapple and apricot fruit. Seems near the beginning of a long decline. 92
I got to try some of the 1986 Canon a few months ago and had a similar experience, though I think the ‘82 is a fair amount better. Also have enjoyed late 80’s L-P’s over the last couple of years which I find provide superb value.
On a similar note, I open 1978 Canon and Figeac last night to do a little comparison. Both better nose than palate, with relatively short finishes . The Canon was very elegant but a little restrained on the nose. The Figeac exploded out of the glass with tobacco, leather, smoke, cassis, and a hint of menthol. It would have merited at least a mid 90’s score if the palate came off better/younger/longer. I settled on 91 for the Canon and 93 for the Figeac.
I remember Parker extolling the virtues of the 82 Canon in his initial report on the 82 Bordeaux vintage. Recent bottlings like 2016 and 2018 have received strong reviews as well.