Fevre: Checking In

Tasting notes, varietals, grapes - anything related to wine
Post Reply
Message
Author
p@ulbortin
Posts: 854
Joined: April 29th, 2010, 9:46 pm

Fevre: Checking In

#1 Post by p@ulbortin »

Most of my 2002 Fevre Chablis across all of the Crus were heavily pre-moxed and I haven’t picked up a bottle since.

Has the situation improved?

User avatar
Kelly Walker
Posts: 2249
Joined: June 6th, 2009, 7:01 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 32 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#2 Post by Kelly Walker »

I gave up on them. I will let others to experiment. Maybe come back when a track record is established. But qpr is degrading as well.
"I was piling up empty bottles of Mugnier, Roumier, Raveneau, Roulot, Gentaz and Rayas like cordwood at Troisgros before you punks were born. Now get your Chignin, Pet-Nat and amphora-raised Poulsard- and Mencia-drinking asses off of my lawn."
- Josh Raynolds

User avatar
Jeremy C
GCC Member
GCC Member
Posts: 1472
Joined: November 11th, 2013, 11:16 am
Location: El Paso
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#3 Post by Jeremy C »

My hope is that 2010 (when Fevre went to DIAM for all bottlings) and beyond that the successes are consistent and worthwhile.
Cuth.bert.son

User avatar
PHuff
GCC Member
GCC Member
Posts: 756
Joined: January 31st, 2010, 5:19 pm
Location: New Jersey
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#4 Post by PHuff »

A bottle of 2004 Les Preuses that I had about 4 months ago was amazing........A classic Chablis which had mellowed over the years, with added weight, but still had cut and balance. I have one more but wish I had another 6........
Paul

User avatar
Dale Bowers
Monopole Crü
Monopole Crü
Posts: 4183
Joined: April 27th, 2010, 9:44 pm
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#5 Post by Dale Bowers »

A 2009 Preusus I had over the last two days was spot on.
Cheers!

Sanjay Nandurkar
Posts: 2425
Joined: June 3rd, 2011, 10:52 pm

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#6 Post by Sanjay Nandurkar »

I purchased a few Fevre Les Clos 2014 after a long hiatus. I opened one bottle last year and it was stunning. If I recall correctly, it was under Diam. A Bouchard Chevalier 2010 under diam last year looked very very young. So I am hoping Fevre (which is under the same umbrella) may survive a bit longer than previously.

User avatar
Mark Y
GCC Member
GCC Member
Posts: 8194
Joined: May 1st, 2009, 11:19 am
Location: Bellevue, WA
Has thanked: 88 times
Been thanked: 51 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#7 Post by Mark Y »

had a 2013 Preuses that i bought from the winery when i visited. nothing wrong with it but kinda boring..
not sure if it's vintage?
Y.e.

john stimson
GCC Member
GCC Member
Posts: 3766
Joined: January 24th, 2010, 8:11 pm
Location: seattle
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 37 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#8 Post by john stimson »

We had the 2004 Preuses recently--not clearly premoxed, but a lot of appley ripeness that seemed atypical, and I wouldn't have identified it as Chablis. That doesn't answer the question, though. I quit buying and haven't tried to age any recently. however, since the complete switch to diam, there seem to be fewer reports of premox since 2010, as opposed to a number of other producers.

User avatar
c fu
Moderator
<dfn>Moderator</dfn>
Posts: 32562
Joined: January 27th, 2009, 1:26 pm
Location: Pasadena
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 177 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#9 Post by c fu »

No issues since Diam. Same as jadot.
Ch@rlie F|_|
"Roulot is Roulot"©

ITB -Salt Vine Wines

Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/clayfu.wine

p@ulbortin
Posts: 854
Joined: April 29th, 2010, 9:46 pm

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#10 Post by p@ulbortin »

Thanks everyone.

User avatar
dsimmons
Posts: 899
Joined: January 7th, 2017, 11:51 am
Location: Anchorage, AK and Rockport, TX
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#11 Post by dsimmons »

I have actually had decent luck with Fevre Chablis but I have stopped buying all white Burg because of premox problems overall.
D o n

User avatar
dr0ch
Posts: 497
Joined: April 26th, 2010, 11:17 pm

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#12 Post by dr0ch »

Maybe just me, but I've had substantially more advanced/oxidized bottles of Clos than any other of the Fevre grand crus. Mostly 04, 07 and 08 vintages.
-Devin

Eric Lundblad
BerserkerBusiness
BerserkerBusiness
Posts: 1900
Joined: January 28th, 2009, 2:36 pm
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#13 Post by Eric Lundblad »

c fu wrote: March 22nd, 2019, 8:49 pm No issues since Diam. Same as jadot.
This is my experience with Fevre as well....starting with 07 for 1er crus and 2010 adding the grand crus. I had a 10 Fevre 1er Mont de Milieu last month that was excellent.

Looks like there's something similar to Diam out now. Trefinos, a spanish cork company esp for sparkling wine, is making a cork that hits the same points...Supercritical CO2 to remove taints, controlled oxygen transmission at different levels (via microspheres), and a higher cork % than Diam apparently. Looks interesting.
Ladd Cellars
Winemaker & Owner

User avatar
craig v
Posts: 3750
Joined: June 21st, 2009, 12:03 pm
Location: MN

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#14 Post by craig v »

So far the 2010s have been stellar.
Jeremy C wrote: March 22nd, 2019, 7:07 pm My hope is that 2010 (when Fevre went to DIAM for all bottlings) and beyond that the successes are consistent and worthwhile.
c vanderah

User avatar
D@vid Bu3ker
Monopole Crü
Monopole Crü
Posts: 41874
Joined: February 14th, 2009, 8:06 am
Location: Connecticut
Has thanked: 372 times
Been thanked: 762 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#15 Post by D@vid Bu3ker »

I didn’t go back to Fevre until 2012, it no issues so far.
David Bueker - Rieslingfan

User avatar
Robert Love
GCC Member
GCC Member
Posts: 240
Joined: August 9th, 2015, 11:45 am
Location: Boston, MA
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#16 Post by Robert Love »

dr0ch wrote: March 23rd, 2019, 2:47 pm Maybe just me, but I've had substantially more advanced/oxidized bottles of Clos than any other of the Fevre grand crus. Mostly 04, 07 and 08 vintages.
Same here. 2008 Les Clos was the worst: 10 out of 12 bottles in the case were oxidized.

User avatar
B. Buzzini
GCC Member
GCC Member
Posts: 4836
Joined: April 20th, 2009, 7:08 pm
Location: Calif.
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 139 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#17 Post by B. Buzzini »

At first, I thought this was going to be a thread with a bunch of notes from Jon Favre! flirtysmile

Darn
Brian
CT - Mrbuzz
IG - mrbuzz11

User avatar
Nowell Karten
Posts: 703
Joined: April 29th, 2010, 1:12 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#18 Post by Nowell Karten »

Eric Lundblad wrote: March 23rd, 2019, 3:25 pm
c fu wrote: March 22nd, 2019, 8:49 pm No issues since Diam.
This is my experience with Fevre as well....starting with 07 for 1er crus and 2010 adding the grand crus.
I haven't had any premoxed post-Diam Fevre either, though my experience isn't vast. Coincidentally, at a recent tasting with Fevre Cellar Master Didier Séguier, I asked him when he thought the 2010 Les Clos might be good to go, as I have a few in my locker. In the course of his answer, if I recall correctly, he said something like, "and they're under Diam, so there's no worry about premox." While I'm unconvinced that premox can be eliminated just by using Diam or similar "corks," the results seem encouraging at least for Fevre.

As an aside, I think Fevre's 2017s are excellent, though I might be biased as I work for someone who sells them.
In the little moment that remains to us between the crisis and the catastrophe,...

Huai-Yi, Huang
Posts: 4
Joined: May 21st, 2018, 6:29 pm

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#19 Post by Huai-Yi, Huang »

I have had 08 Les Clos & 08 Vaudesir last month. Both of them show no sign of premox and have great potential for further aging.

User avatar
alan weinberg
GCC Member
GCC Member
Posts: 14400
Joined: April 25th, 2009, 1:23 pm
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#20 Post by alan weinberg »

Fevre 17 offer hit inbox this am. Doubt I will resist.

User avatar
Dav1d S@wyer
GCC Member
GCC Member
Posts: 427
Joined: January 27th, 2009, 10:23 pm
Location: Houston
Has thanked: 60 times
Been thanked: 20 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#21 Post by Dav1d S@wyer »

Kelly Walker wrote: March 22nd, 2019, 6:53 pm But qpr is degrading as well.
Yep.
IG: davidswine

User avatar
Jim Stewart
GCC Member
GCC Member
Posts: 2243
Joined: July 31st, 2018, 9:49 am
Location: MA / FL
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#22 Post by Jim Stewart »

Coincidentally, yesterday I did a taste-off of two Chablis and posted a TN. Both were around $25, the 2017 Domaine offering of Fevre one of them. I found this thread afterwards. Interesting stuff, some beyond me, but FWIW here is a pic of the two corks (which I just dug out of the trash). The Fevre diam is on the right.
The 2015 Laroche was disappointing, and I wonder if it is possible to deduce early stages of premox in such a youngish wine. The color was slightly yellow but not dark by any means;the flavor was "empty". BTW the Fevre was mighty tasty!
corks2.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
He's a wino, tried and true!
-Guy Clark

Eric Lundblad
BerserkerBusiness
BerserkerBusiness
Posts: 1900
Joined: January 28th, 2009, 2:36 pm
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 10 times

Re: Fevre: Checking In

#23 Post by Eric Lundblad »

Nowell Karten wrote: March 25th, 2019, 1:18 am
Eric Lundblad wrote: March 23rd, 2019, 3:25 pm
c fu wrote: March 22nd, 2019, 8:49 pm No issues since Diam.
This is my experience with Fevre as well....starting with 07 for 1er crus and 2010 adding the grand crus.
I haven't had any premoxed post-Diam Fevre either, though my experience isn't vast. Coincidentally, at a recent tasting with Fevre Cellar Master Didier Séguier, I asked him when he thought the 2010 Les Clos might be good to go, as I have a few in my locker. In the course of his answer, if I recall correctly, he said something like, "and they're under Diam, so there's no worry about premox." While I'm unconvinced that premox can be eliminated just by using Diam or similar "corks," the results seem encouraging at least for Fevre.

As an aside, I think Fevre's 2017s are excellent, though I might be biased as I work for someone who sells them.
Despite Didier's statement/implication, I don't think Fevre would claim that Diam is solely responsible for their premox turn around. Fevre was fairly up front, esp compared to many other problem domaines, that they had problems and that they were taking a number of different steps to address it. A new superlow dissolved oxygen bottling machine for example, and higher sulfur levels both during elevage and at bottling (occasionally a bit high), and other steps. I doubt they would have been successful without taking those prior steps...but Diam does seems like an essential part of their solution.
Ladd Cellars
Winemaker & Owner

Post Reply

Return to “Wine Talk”