Brisk lemon beautifully balanced by dense apple blueberry fruit. Long finish dusted with minerality and a terrific impression of elegance. Classic DP nose. This has to be one of the all time great DPs! 95pts
That’s amazing. No diff in juice. They literally just put a shinier label on it and release it earlier for $40ish more?? That’s a great marketing department.
I tasted / drank the 2008 Dom Pérignon the other day. It is better than the 2002 and the best Dom Pérignon since 1996. That being said, despite all the talk of them being risk takers and pushing the envelope (which is true within the confines of how much they produce), it is clear that the wines of today do not have the same intensity of character and ultimate quality as the great Dom Pérignon vintages of the 1980s, still less the 1960s. Given how much is produced, of course, it remains a remarkably high quality and consistent wine.
Additionally, I find '96 to be on par with '82. To early for me to make a call, but '08 may surpass every DP going back to '76.
I agree the hey day of DP was from the late 40’s thru '76 and that might be the greatest three decade run of any Champagne house during the 20th century.
Hard to truly compare as the original disgorgements of '82 and '85 are getting a bit long in the tooth from all but the best cellars, whereas '96 and '02 are still in the flush of youth. The latest P3 disgorgement of the 1985, however, is a step above the 1996 P2 or original releases in terms of depth and complexity. But it sounds like we are essentially in agreement.
What I find perplexing is that, reading much of the critical commentary, one would conclude that a wine such as the 2002 Dom Pérignon is the equal or superior of a wine such as the 1988 Krug, and that just doesn’t make any sense to me.
Not a Champ-pro like you boys but the 2004 I popped last night was gorgeous, better than the very solid 2009 I had several weeks back. Amazing quality wine considering the quantity produced.