A 1929 Grand Chambertin was the insane winner in a dinner with great wines

This dinner is held at Pages Restaurant. Given the smallness of the restaurant’s cellar, I deliver the wines on the day of the dinner, at 2 pm. Then chaining appointments, I find myself with a friend and a winemaker at the bistrot 116 Pages, drinking a Champagne Rosé Selosse disgorged in 2015. Arrived too cold, it is more cider than champagne and gradually it will flourish finally offering what should be Selosse rosé champagne, strong, impregnating and vivacious.

I am hard at work to open the bottles of dinner at 5 pm. An Englishman who will attend dinner tonight and recently attended the last session of the Academy of Ancient Wines is by my side to observe what I am doing. Even if some corks break in a few pieces, I do not have any major problems. Some perfumes are of stunning nobility, like Cyprus 1870, bomb of pepper and spices, the Fargues 1949 which has the majesty of very large Sauternes and the Petrus 1976, which is in the definition of the perfect Petrus. I said before opening the wines to Lewis that what best represents my passion for wine is the Grand Chambertin 1929. When I open the bottle, the sensuality of the discreet but promising fragrance moves me. We will see later what it is at the time of the votes. The white Haut-Brion 1990 has a rather discreet nose compared to what I expected. The only uncertainty is the Rausan-Ségla 1934 which could have a hint of cork. We will see.

We are ten, three of whom are new, with an overwhelming male majority against my will. The only woman registered phoned an hour before the meal to announce to the restaurant that she could not come because of a robbery she had just suffered. I almost got her to come anyway, but after saying yes she said no. She was replaced at short notice by a young American student at Le Cordon Bleu School whose director is at our table. There is an American, an English, a Belgian, a Lyonnais and six Parisians around the table.

The menu was developed with Chef Teshi and his team a few days ago and my suggestions were accepted. It is on the realization that the dinner was prodigious. The appetizers are: ceviché of ‘lieu jaune’ / iced carrot / chervil tuber / parmesan and beetroot.

The menu is: Royal sea bream carpaccio, caviar Daurenki, lemon caviar / ‘pouces-pieds’, mayonnaise with parsley and garlic / abalone, risotto, sea lettuce / red mullet, red wine sauce / lobster blue breton, sauce civet / veal sweetbreads, chanterelles / pigeon from Vendée, salmis, artichoke with barigoule, cherry / stilton / mangoes, fresh / financial almonds.

It’s warm weather so it is nice to have an aperitif on the sidewalk, Naoko, Teshi’s wife, coming to bring us appetizers. Champagne Dom Pérignon Magnum 1992 when served is a bit imprecise and short, as if he had a tiny trace of cork. But in fact it snorts, warms quickly because it is very warm in Paris and the champagne takes off and really looks like a beautiful Dom Pérignon, long, with a well-controlled acidity and generous yellow fruit flavors. It’s especially the sweet ice cream carrot that expands the champagne.

We go to the table and on the sea bream carpaccio we drink Champagne Pol Roger 1959. Its color is beautiful light amber, the bubble is almost invisible but the sparkling is there. This champagne combines with happiness unparalleled sweetness with a rare energy. He is noble and conquering and the agreement is good. We did not all have the same proportion of lemon caviar. My plate had a lot and others little and lemon caviar in high doses fights against champagne. But overall this champagne is exciting and joyful.

Château Haut-Brion Blanc 1990 is a legendary wine. I expected a lot and I find a real lack of power. It remains big with the beautiful bitterness of the wines of Graves, but it is not flamboyant and the demonstration will be given by the white who will follow it. The ‘pouces-pieds’ are delicious, original and it’s not the mayonnaise that suits them best, but a delicate vinaigrette that excites the Haut-Brion.

What abalone, these abalone! A marvel of taste. So, the Corton Charlemagne Bouchard Father & Son 1959 is totally at ease, glorious, serene, the real crooner. It is for my taste the risotto that propels Burgundy to an exceptional level of emotion.

It’s one of my quirks to associate Pétrus with red mullet. This will be the case again. The nose of Pétrus Pomerol 1976 was magical at the opening. He is even more so. And this rich pomerol is heavy with truffles and charcoal. It is a glorious and distinguished Petrus. The mullet is beautifully cooked, its skin is a treat and the agreement shows once again its relevance. What a beautiful Petrus!

I made suggestions for lobster and did not expect that they would be followed with such talent. I said that I much prefer the lobster body to the claws and now there is the body alone, without the slightest flourish, placed on a heavy sauce. And we are going to live one of those rare moments that I cherish: Château Rauzan-Ségla Margaux 1934is’ the sauce of lobster, like lobster sauce ‘is’ Margaux 1934. The continuity of taste is total. And the wine, for which I dreaded a possible taste of cork, is glorious. It is balanced, serene like the Corton-Charlemagne and all this is due to the long period of aeration of the wine. Powerful wine has no age, it is timeless. I would never have imagined that this wine that was reconditionned probably forty years ago would reach such a new perfection.

The Grand Chambertin Grand Cru Sosthène de Grésigny 1929 is a wine of Jules Régnier, owner of the estate Sosthène de Grésigny. My heart belongs to him because it is in the line of my passion to look for curiosities which can be placed on a par with, even above much more capped wines. This wine is charm and subtlety. Everything is velvet in him. The nose has charm and the mouth is of a total sweetness. It is at once the odalisque of Ingres for mad seduction and d’Artagnan for persuasion. The perfect calf sweetbread is discreet, because on a stage, it is appropriate to be able to emphasize the first role, the star of the show. How this wine does stir my heart! I’m thrilled and Banana Republic votes will show that I was not the only one.

The pigeon is a marvel, the artichokes are sweets and the cherry is the touch of genius that will excite the Côte Rôtie La Landonne Guigal 1991. This wine is a lord, heavy but freshness minty. This is the most successful year for this Landonne and since we have just gone back 62 years since the Chambertin, all this seems an absolute natural. We are all dazzled by so much culinary perfection.

Château de Fargues 1949 is so brown that it is almost black. At the opening he had a perfume of incredible complexity. It still has it and this warm wine is madly complex in the mouth. The agreement with stilton fat is superb and while we have already eaten well, we would have wished more. Sauternes is also paired with a mango and fresh almond dessert that showcases other facets of wine with incredible charm.

The Porto Burmester 1920 had a discreet nose at the opening. The nose is a little more radiant and it is in the mouth that everything is played. This port is all in refinement. He is delicate despite his power. He surfs on the tongue to show his fluidity. The financiers accompany him with happiness. He has palpitations of rare elegance.

The financiers will also accompany the 1870 Cyprus Wine and there is no better tenet than these little pastries. Cyprus is a pepper bomb. While it is rich in spicy flavors, it can give the impression of being dry. But the most mesmerizing is that it takes us to territories of unknown flavors. We find ourselves lying on a beach next to vahinés wearing fragrant flowers that sing soft and enveloping melodies like their perfumes. I like this trip in another dimension.
It is time to vote and we all have stars that shine in our eyes as we lived a unique moment. Each of the ten participants must vote for five favorite wines out of the eleven of the meal and what fills me with joy is that the eleven wines appear in at least one vote. The Chambertin Grand Cru Sosthène de Grésigny 1929 has an insolent score that I think I never had at one of my dinners: nine first-in-ten votes. Never. The other wine that was voted first is the Petrus by a single voter.

The consensus vote would be:
1 - Chambertin Grand Cru Sosthenes Grésigny 1929,
2 - Pétrus Pomerol 1976,
3 - Château Rausan-Ségla Margaux 1934,
4 - Corton Charlemagne Castle Beaune Bouchard Father & Son 1959,
5 - Champagne Pol Roger 1959,
6 - Wine of Cyprus 1870.

My vote is:
1 - Chambertin Grand Cru Sosthenes Grésigny 1929,
2 - Wine of Cyprus 1870,
3 - Pomerol Pétrus 1976,
4 - Champagne Pol Roger 1959,
5 - Château de Fargues 1949.

All the guests who had already participated in my dinners say that we are at a higher level than anything they have known. It must be said that all agreements have worked through the simplification of the recipies, which does not hinder talent. The presence of pouce-pieds and abalone at dinner was a pleasure because it is not every day that we eat. The most beautiful agreement was the symbiosis of Rausan-Ségla 1934 with the lobster sauce, so beautiful in its simplicity, followed for me by the risotto with Corton-Charlemagne 1959. The cherry on La Landonne is a whim I love and financiers on Porto and Cyprus are a piece of happiness.

The attentive guests brilliantly animated this meal held most often in English so that Lewis could participate in the debates. I am still amazed at the absolute success of this beautiful meal.

the votes of the dinner show the incredible success of the 1929 Chambertin

the votes are in columns. My vote is in the grey column.

What became of “Sosthène de Grésigny”?

Was it a negociant house?

Here is a partial list of modern producers of Le Chambertin:

I can’t even find an online dictionary which can translate the words "“Sosthène” or “Grésigny”, although there is a Grésigny vineyard in Rully:
rully.png

I love reading your write-ups of these dinners. sounds like such a treat!

Wonderful notes as usual. I have had a few Regniers from the ‘60s, and they have been as described, silk wonders.

Great read as always!

Jules Regnier disappeared in the inter-war years but had, amongst others, great chunks of Latricières and the monopoly of Clos Blanc de Vougeot. Those ended up in the hands of Faiveley and Vougeraie respectively. I’ve only had three with the Regnier label, but all were memorable, particularly one time the Clos Blanc de Vougeot 1919 - courtesy Jasper Morris & BB&R…

The 1929

I love such bottles which seem so sane.
Sosthène is a firstname

Absolutely love these notes. I would love to attend these someday. Older Pol Roget is my favorite champagne.

the wines of this dinner.

Great notes François .

I had a half bottle of 1930 Musigny from Jules Régnier recently. Sadly, no amount of ‘Audouzing’ could bring it back to life. It was completely oxidised. The label listed Comte de Vogue as the source of the Musigny. I still have a half of 1928 Volnay that I have high hopes for.

“What became of Sosthène de Grésigny?”

Hi Nathan,

A friend happened to see this and knows of my abiding interest in the history of Burgundy and as it turns out, this domaine is one of the more fascinating stories I have come across. For starters, I assume you mean what happened to the domaine rather than what happened to Sosthène the person? Just in case, Sosthène was born in Gevrey in 1841 and passed away in Gevrey in 1919.

As to the domaine, it was one of the more richly endowed enterprises in Gevrey’s history, not that there aren’t competitors. In the last decade of the 19th C they held parcels in Chambertin, Clos de Bèze, Mazis, Latricières, Clos St. Jacques, Cazetiers, Les St. Georges, Les Cailles, Richemone, Vignes Rondes and the Clos Blanc de Vougeot. They were closely associated with Jules Régnier though much more so after Sosthène passed away.

Some parcels were sold off piecemeal to help pay for the inheritance taxes and thus not everything that I cited above, like the Clos Blanc and Clos St. Jacques for example, were still owned after 1919. Moreover, at some point between 1919 and 1931, Régnier took control of de Grésigny.

Fast forward to 1931 and some very tough economic times after the market crash of 1929. Wines were not selling at any price and thus the stocks held on Régnier’s books were vastly over valued. Faiveley had business dealings with Régnier and was forced to step in when Régnier was at risk of going under. They replaced approximately two-thirds of Régnier’s capital base in 1934 but in doing so took control of the underlying assets, which formed the basis of much of Faiveley’s holdings in Gevrey and Nuits today. So, as of 1934, Régnier, and Domaine Sosthène de Grésigny with it, ceased to exist.

As to the usage of Grand Chambertin for the 1929, Régnier used it since at least 1898 and they were not the only one. I have had the 1915, 1919 and the 1923 so labeled as well as number of the other Régnier wines of that period including the 1919 Clos Blanc that Bill mentioned. There are two theories about this usage. The first is that the term harkens back to the 15th C when Chambertin was divided in Grand and Petit, much in the same way Musigny is today. The second is that Grand Chambertin actually refers to Clos de Bèze due to the fact that CdB is actually slightly larger than Chambertin proper (15.4 vs 12.9 ha). My sense is that it refers to Clos de Bèze but that is a supposition on my part. I say this partially because I have also had a 1904 Chambertin from Régnier and given that they were using Grand Chambertin since at least 1898, it was probably because they were trying to draw a distinction between Chambertin and Grand Chambertin, or so it’s at least plausible to posit.

Hope you find this of some interest and cheers.

Thank you, Allen.

Awesome info. Thanks burghound!

Allen,
I have several bottles of Regnier from the 1960s, so not sure how this makes sense as you mentioned Regnier ceased to exist post 1934. The labels are the same as in Francois’ photograph.

Allen,
Thank you for this very interesting information.
What has always struck is the quality of the bottles of this Domain. They look sane. And the level of this 1929 was 2 to 3 cm, which is remarkable.

When I invited Mark Squires to taste old wines in Paris, I opened a 1913 Chambertin Jules Régnier which was of the highest quality.
Cheers,

Hi Mark,

My apologies as I poorly phrased the “ceased to exist” comment as I too have had Régnier wines from the '50s and '60s, with the last being a '66 Musigny. It would have been more accurate to say that Grésigny and Régnier ceased to exist as independent entities as obviously Régnier, as a brand name, continued.

A.

Salut François,

Wow, 1913 is a vintage one doesn’t see very often and it’s all the more remarkable that the '13 Chambertin was so good given what a poor vintage, indeed it was genuinely awful.

As an interesting aside, there is one other point of historical interest related to 1913, which is that it is the year that marks the lowest number of hectares in production for all of Burgundy. After phylloxera hit Burgundy (all of Europe too but I’m specifically referring to Burgundy here) in the late 1870s, the surface area planted continued to decline as it was terribly expensive to replant on American rootstocks or continue the even more expensive, not to mention dangerous, carbon-sulfur injections. As such, many very steep and/or less desirable plots were simply abandoned. Once it had been demonstrated that the hybrid French/American vines could not only thrive but produce very fine wine, some of the abandoned plots were replanted. However this took a surprisingly long time. For example, I have photos taken in the 1950s of the vineyards in Puligny where a good part of the hillside isn’t planted, which is hard to believe given the €1 million per ouvrée price tag the 1ers there command today. And of course everyone knows the story of Jayer and Cros Parantoux, which he too reclaimed from scrub land in the 1950s.

Bien amicalement,

a.

Allen,

When you refer to lowest number of hectares under production, is that just the Cote d’Or or greater Burgundy?

Also, do you know the year in which hectares under production got back to their pre-phylloxera peak?

Thanks in advance.