lunch with great wines in restaurant Arpège

Alexander is Dutch and lives in London. He attended two of my dinners. He tells me he’s coming to Paris and would like me to meet one of his friends. When I ask him which restaurant he would like to eat at, he says Arpege restaurant, which is not the worst place. Immediately I reserve at the restaurant asking that they warn Alain Passard of my coming. It is necessary that the wines are at the height of the place. Alexander announces Perrier-Jouët Belle Epoque 1982 and Amir his friend announces Montrose 1964. I had planned to bring a great 1971 grand cru chablis, but as Alexander works in the group Pernod Ricard which owns Perrier-Jouët, I decide at the last moment to bring a Perrier-Jouët Brut 1959 because I’m pretty sure he never drank it. I had several days ago recovered the wines of Alexander and Amir at the hotel where Alexander also lodges. Early in the morning, that is to say at 11 am, I am in the restaurant to open the wines.

The charming person at the reception looks in her files and sees no reservation in my name or on behalf of my friends and she has the good reflex: of authority, she decides to award me a table for three, whatever the consequences. Congratulations! At 11 o’clock I only have one wine to open, the Montrose 1964. And now I find myself facing the worst possible case of opening a wine. It should be said that the bottle with the original cap has a level at the base of the neck, which is exceptional for a wine of 53 years. I sting my corkscrew and it appears that the cap is stuck to the neck and that the cap, incredibly weak and porous, shreds as soon as I pull up. So I start curettage since nothing of the cap wants to go up. After long minutes of tampering to extract crumbs I am resolved to use a bimetallic strip. I try to plant it but, oh horror, the cork drops two centimetres. What I need now is to prevent it from falling into the wine. I take my long wick which erupts but does not rise. I must then resume curettage and after contortions that lasted twenty minutes, all the crumbs are out except those that still stick to the glass and that I cannot scratch, otherwise they would fall into the wine. Everything is finished, the wine smells good. I have to wait. As the small dining room is like an anthill that works in all directions, I’ll have a beer at the nearest bistro.

At the appointed time we meet Alexander, a little late, Amir and me. A waiter suggests we let us be guided, avoiding allergies and it gives a psychedelic menu that Adeline was kind enough to write for me to testify: tartlets: celery, lemon, thyme / carrot, rutabaga, garlic / beetroot, sauge onion. Then: sushi: flower beet petal with fig flower oil and Kalamata black olive tapenade / Erquy scallop carpaccio, curry and olive oil / hot-cold egg, boiled egg to remove the white to deposit an aerial mousse with sherry vinegar and four spices, all washed down with maple syrup / ravioli of three colors and their steaming consommé composed of celery, Jerusalem artichoke, turnip and mint / scallop quenelle and Jerusalem artichoke, yellow wine emulsion and cream of red cabbage / falafelle: beetroot, onion, turnip and hazelnut on its bed of orange compote, carrot and smoked onion / bouillabaisse: sole, langoustine, squid, lobster, scallops, golden vegetable shoots and yellow wine emulsion, langoustine bisque with carrot and saffron / duck pithiviers, black truffle, foamed chicken liver emulsion / Kalamata olive and grilled sauge / pigeon celery cream, Rooibos / mint tea red sauce, verbena tile, puff pastry, royal icing and kasha fat, vanilla celery macaroon, honey caramel from our hives, pear, hazelnut, fig, raisin and chocolate nougat , button of rose with apples / paris-brest and its praline of nuts / pasteïs del nata: Jerusalem artichoke, vanilla and lemon bergamot / millefeuille chocolate Peruvian and oil of argan on its caramel of orange.
In writing this account, I am living proof that it is possible to survive this maelstrom of generosity (15 different services). The dishes are so plentiful that we believe at every moment that there will be nothing after, but the cuisine is so light and exquisite that we push each dish the limits of the possible.

Champagne Perrier-Jouët Belle Epoque 1982 has a light color quite amazing. On the palate the wine is young, very young even. It lacks a bit of width but is still cold, and its structure is very elegant.

I suggested that we taste the two champagnes together and we are served Champagne Perrier-Jouët Brut 1959 which is amber, but not too much, with few bubbles but a sparkling well marked. This champagne has all the charm of old champagnes with a complexity much higher than that of 1982. What strikes Alexander is that the two champagnes have a certain cousinage and he recalls that we drank together in London a Moët 1911 and a Moët 1971 whose DNAs were spectacularly identical. It is the same for this 1959 and 1982. As the dishes are served, the 1982 expands, flourishes and the 1959 shows its liveliness and impressive depth.

The dish that excites me the most is the ravioli of three colors and their smoking consommé composed of celery, Jerusalem artichoke, turnip and mint. This dish is unheard of and makes me want to taste Château Montrose 1964. This Bordeaux is spectacular, with an incredible velvet and a truffled depth that I did not expect. It is able to accompany many dishes without ever changing level, keeping an incredible balance. What a great wine!

It was necessary to order a Champagne Philipponnat Clos des Goisses Extra Brut 2008 as the endless dishes followed each other. It is a very solid champagne, straight, square, expressive, but which, because of its young age, cannot fight with its older elders.

The cuisine of Alain Passard, who was not present, is an inspired cuisine, with tastes of remarkable subtlety. The service was attentive and pleasant. When I said that the greatest wine of the meal is the absolutely perfect Montrose 1964, Alexander said to Amir: “Take advantage of this compliment because frequently the winner for François is one of his wines”. Here is a friend who knows me well!
It was a great lunch with brilliant wines in a talented restaurant.

the cork of Montrose 1964 !!!

Glad to see the excellent showing of the 1964 Montrose. I have had extremely good luck with that wine, one of the few Left Bank and not Graves wines picked before the rain.

Thank you Francois!

At some point I’d love to see a video of you struggling with a difficult old cork; I think it would be instructive as well as entertaining [wink.gif]

it is not a video but it explains how I proceed

http://www.academiedesvinsanciens.org/method-for-opening-old-bottles-2/

I’m not sure we need a video.

The mental picture of Francois’s long wick erupting but not rising is quite enough. :astonished:

Gareth,
I am sure that I understand your point. Why do you say “not rising” ?

Wonderfully interesting!

It is a play on words suggestive of premature ejaculation prior to obtaining a full erection. Hence, not something we’d actually like to see in a video.

I had lunch there last October (the Rolling Stones were in town).It was an amazing experience. It’s funny, they have a menu with very expensive dishes. When I opened it, I was concerned. Waiter said she’d be back to explain.

She says the ‘lunch of the day’ is $140 (or close to that); the other dishes you could order were around $300. I ask, ‘what comes with lunch’? She says ‘it is different for everybody and you will be very happy’. That was confusing for a second. I decided to give it a try. Boy, was I happy.

The small veggie dishes kept coming (close to 15), then a plate of fish then a plate of beef with a compliments. The three colored ravioli was spectacular. The desserts were many, but the pistachio soufle with chocolate was very special. Since he focuses on the fresh produce he grows, each season different. Love to try spring and summer. Alain Passard was there and literally sat down at each table and talked to everyone.

Unfortunately, I did not have the spectacular wines like you. Though, the 2014 half bottle of Chablis and glasses of wine were reasonably priced. It was different than most 3 star restaurants. Best lunch I’ve ever had. Thank you for helping me relive it.

This takes me back to Sept 1997 when we had lunch at Arpege. There was a picture of his mother on the wall and the special of the day
was her duck cooked for 2-which we had and was excellent. Also the som talked me into a JA Ferret 1986 Hors Clesse-what a wonderful wine.
One of our all time best lunches. Thanks for bringing back the memories.

the picture of the mother of Alain Passard has been replaced for a while by a picture of Alain Senderens who created the “Nouvelle Cuisine” in the place where Alain Passard is now.
I find it a very nice attention.

If you want to see the pictures of the 15 dishes we had in is with this link :
http://www.academiedesvinsanciens.org/dejeuner-au-restaurant-arpege-3/

I am happy that Douglas, like me found the three raviolis the best dish.

in fact, the three are four!

Thank you; great write up, and enjoyed the account of you and your struggles with the bottle of Montrose 1964. Sounds as if you both won.

I always think of Arpege as unreliable; it is so often experimental that the successes and failures are epic, which is why I love the place. This is not a chef who plays safe, and frankly if I wanted formulaic cooking, I would go elsewhere. Congratulations on being able to harness the chef so well.

I’ll have to go back and ask for the 4th one! It is the only dish I don’t have a picture of (I’m not able to transfer pics anyways). I think it’s one of the pics of my face. But, I find it strange that there was another silver bowl with a dark substance in the ravioli also.

Being there by myself, I noticed they would bring out a tray of certain dishes. And, if you weren’t eating something then, they would bring you that. That is why the dishes varied. And, the trays keep coming. But, everyone on the lunch got the fish and meat toward the end. They brought out the fish and beef to show you before they cut it up into dishes.

A fish presented to all the tables

I have been sometimes fooled by such presentation. Normally in a restaurant the maître d’hôtel comes to your table to show you the duck of the fish that you have ordered before it is prepared for you. But in Arpège, they show the big fish or big meat which will be used for many tables.

One day, I was invited by a friend and we were four. At one moment a waiter came and showed us an enormous lobster which could feed tens of people. I asked my friend : “did you win in a lottery a fortune if you want us to eat such an impressive lobster”?

And I was rather surprised when a tiny piece of lobster was put in my plate!