From the first study ever to explore the changes in wine glass size over time (from 1700 to the present), we learn that,
“As we approach the culturally legitimised deviancy of festive drinking, we suggest that size does matter: look at the wine glass in your hand.”
Disturbing conclusion in the BMJ (formerly the British Medical Journal):
“some evidence of a link between wine glass size and drinking suggests that reducing the size of wine glasses in licensed premises and in our homes could reduce consumption.”
I believe this is relevant when one isn’t imbibing a fixed amount; that is, if you and your partner are drinking a bottle over supper and the evening, it matters not what glass you use. If you’re at a party with effectively unlimited wine, then it likely does matter.
Carrie just bought some new merchandise for the holidays which include a red wine glass that holds 750 ml. Figured if we couldn’t sell them we could use them because our doctors want us to cut down to one or two glasses of wine a night.
Yup. I have a collection of the Reidel Restaurant Series glasses which are a bit more diminutive than my typical stems and which I use when we host. Makes for healthier pours and evenings, IMHO.
I suspect the focus is not wine geeks who prize the nose of the wines they drink, but rather the UK trend that started about 15 years ago, for wine to be sold in 250ml servings, with only enough headspace in the glass to avoid spillage, and often targeting female drinkers. Then add in drinks promotions such as ‘buy 2 and get the 3rd one free’ and I’d agree that this would present a problem.