TN: Two amazing 90s Hermitages

Afternoon all,

Here are a couple of notes on two stunning 90s Hermitages I had with my partner and a friend recently. I’ve only posted those two notes because I think they are long enough to bore most most people to tears. If you want to read my introductory preamble and a note on a 90s Barolo as well then head off here: http://elitistreview.com/2017/10/16/three-wines-three-men/

Here are the two Hermitage notes:

Hermitage 1998, Domaine du Colombier
Soft, mellow, scented old beauty, my arse! This is the nose of a fresh, vigorous wine charged with life and energy – wehay! I have to admit to being rather surprised. Definitely surprised in the very best of ways, most certainly!

A lot of Colombier Hermitages have that vaguely unpleasant smell of beetroot when they are young; this has matured in the sense of losing that aroma. In every other respect this smells like a wine that you could think of ageing the rest of your case for another nineteen years, as it is so lustily vivacious. I do not have a ‘rest of a case’, I may be lucky and have another bottle. That would be very lucky if I do as the quality of this shines through with coruscating brilliance.

It is not the slightest bit dirty or mellow. The fruit is powerful, clean as a whistle and manly in the powerful (rather than soaked in stinking sweat after a gruelling day battling mano e mano with bears) manner one really hopes one will find when popping a bottle of Hermitage. What gives it that power is the ripeness (and consequently a higher alcohol level than Colombier admit on the label), freshness and splendorous complexity.

The alcohol is not the slightest problem. There is so much going on with this nose it seems to need to be (distinctly) over the admitted 13% in order to be the ravishingly butch entity that a real Hermitage should be. It fits with the energetic, almost youthful fruit and the lusty set of aromas that comes from having enough climats across the Hermitage hill.

Colombier may not be endowed with a large holding on the Hermitage hill but, unlike someone like Yann Chave (who is similarly poorly endowed in size), the holding is spread over many plots of the different sub-vineyards (climats) on the hill. Hence, Yann Chave makes powerful but, alas, limited of dimension and totally lacking in cellaring potential wines from this stupendous hill. Colombier’s output may be small yet one could ask for nothing more in terms of its almost sesquipedalian complexity.

Whilst I am sniping at Yann Chave’s ingenuous Hermitage, I cannot stand his maladroit use of new oak. It just adds to the cost of a wine that is simply too plodding to merit such lavish an upbringing. This treatment makes the wine seem like some ‘made by the numbers’-winery Australian Shiraz. That is a poor show for such a grand vineyard.

OK, we have the nose: energetic and vivacious, powerfully and intensely fruity and earthy, gloriously involute and a shade boozy. Yeah, that is a Hermitage nose we want! Time to get drinking!

POW! Yep, Hermitage is indeed the manliest wine in France! This explodes with rich, powerful and god-damned joyful exuberance from the moment the tiniest drop hits your palate. There is an incredible density to it; as you chew it around your mouth, layers of complex and beatific flavours compete for your attention. I felt, almost literally, gobsmacked.

Age has mellowed the tannins to a degree – there definitely a svelte, silken, edge to their potent structure. It is big and full yet has enough refinement, both from mellowed tannins and subtly integrated acidity – that certainly adds to the impression of energy and life that permeates this wine – to make this, in terms of the structure alone, a captivatingly delicious drink.

Then there is all that glorious fruit – cripes it is deeee-lish! Again, age seems to have mellowed and softened it a shade, but there is no lack of life or vim here. The blackberry and blackcurrant fruit that pulse with life through the palate do not have any harshness or bitter pips to them, it is all about having fun and tingling with delight as the waves of unrestrained pleasure wash around your mouth. Yum yum!

There is ample Syrah peppery spice and you could not ask for a more mind-buggering complex Syrah to drink (you drink this, not just taste it). Yes, you can identify this as coming from the Hermitage terroirs, but that does not make it dirty in any way at all.

There is no silliness with too much new oak, that pleases me. Some might object to that fact that you would get completely newscasted if you drank a whole bottle by yourself, but it is Hermitage from a ripe vintage – that is what it is supposed to be like!

All-in-all, a fabulous, complex, energetic with that age has only touched slightly. I really hope I do have another bottle, because I bet in ten to… erm… bloody hell, why not?.. twenty years’ time this will be incomparably stunning!

Hermitage La Chapelle 1995, Jaboulet
I hope you will forgive a bit of historical indulgence at the start of my comments on Lash 95.

My friends from the Oxford Blind Tasting Team and I first tried this wine as a cask sample at Domaine Jaboulet with the great Gerard Jaboulet himself! He had made all of the great vintages of Hermitage La Chapelle (aka Lash) I had tried up to that point and meeting the man himself was somewhat awe-inspiring. He was a lovely, generous fellow (he gave us a case of St. Joseph to drink with our next engagement in the timetable of our burn around the Northern Rhone: lunch! I think most of that case still exists somewhere in Jeremy’s cellar…). It tasted fantastic then and every bottle we purchased from the seemingly endless supply at Oxford’s Oddbins Fine Wine tasted just as fantastic. I was so sad when I learned of his passing and really pissed off when I tasted what his relatives and the people they sold on to did to the Domaine. We shall not see this like again – oh well, I will, as I have another bottle! Only one… sniffle

OK, let us begin properly! Now this is the powerfully sweaty man who has been mud-fighting mano e mano with bears for several days and drinking Elixir Vegetal de Chartreuse to keep his strength up. It is more than a bit dirty and, my, it is rather boozy and lush. I always remember it being a touch on the Lucullan end of the Hermitage spectrum, but this bottle does seem particularly of the Molotov Cocktail idiom. Wehay!

Some of the sweaty dirt on the nose is undoubtedly Brett, so there is a hint of shit to the dirtiness. However, the fruit is so wildly extravagant and opulently overblown, lush as I said, it does not seem too bothersome. The presence of Brett in this wine might go some way to explaining the variability in the last few bottles I have had. Brett makes wines age unevenly, if you did not know this. Out of the last four bottles I have had, two have been scented beauties, but very tired and falling apart within twenty minutes of opening them. This bottle and another have had explosive, succulent fruit, but the fruit seems a bit more mature from this bottle.

There is nothing wrong with mature fruit, as long as it is not over-mature and dead. Pleasingly, this is full of life, even if just the tiniest bit of that life is bacterial and fungal as the fruit shows hints of decay. Mainly, it is lovely and plummy with some strong hints of very ripe blackberry. If you are lucky enough to have bottles that Brett has eaten as slowly as it has with this bottle you should not fear the fruit surviving for more than ten years – in the best of cellars, of course!

Just to be complete on the sweaty, dirty aromas. Drinkers of Australian fighting wines will know that very ripe Syrah/Shiraz can often have a slight whiff of sweat to them; those beginning to blind taste should be aware that ‘sweaty saddle’ is one of the terms one uses to describe Australian Shiraz monsters. 1995 was very hot and some people, including Jaboulet, let their wines soak up an awful lot of sun. Sweatiness is not a fault as such on Northern Rhone Syrahs, but one does rather hope vignerons will get out there and harvest before the grapes get ripe enough to show this. We can forgive this.

If you’ve drank Jaboulet wines from 1997 and earlier you will have noticed that they always have an slight earthy character to them. This was just ‘house style’ for Jaboulet. With long-term cellar age, and especially when a hint of Brett is blowing around, this earthy character can become quite strong. Again this is not exactly a fault, it is more how you would really expect a twenty-two year old Jaboulet wine to smell.

Now, I am definitely not a coprophile – definitely not, got that? However, I also think from a wine from the good times of Gerard being at the helm – probably the last truly great wine of his era in charge – can also be forgiven for having a hint of Brett-derived shittiness. I know some people will not tolerate any Brett character in their wines at all. Moreover, it is perfectly possible that I am being over-generous as I loved this wine limitlessly in its youth and it has been a close and much-loved associate of mine since that barrel sample in the 90s. Furthermore, it could also be that I am not being overly harsh on this wine because the Colombier Hermitage got me drunk enough to be friendly and forgiving.

Consequently, I am sure we can all agree that, whilst this nose is not a model of perfection, it is a quite attractive and certainly lubricious (whilst definitely not involving coprophilia) nose for a 22 year old Gerard Jaboulet Hermitage – and it could indicate that at least some of one’s remaining stock could develop further in pleasurable directions. If you do not agree with that I will see you outside later (I am the tall chap with glasses, a cricket bat and a Glock 20-shaped bulge in my armpit).

Good, it smells nice, how does it taste? My first reaction is that it is rocket fuel! That alcohol does give it a sweet, power-crazed character. Then it fills your palate with that soft, rich, booze-enhanced fruit and you really feel this is a lush old lovely.

The acidity levels are on the low side and this had never been a wine of tough, hard tannins; it has such a lush structure too. Easy, but quite nice.

There is a bit more than simple lasciviousness here, though. The earthiness works as a foil for the plump fruit and the two taste reasonably complex together. You do not have to work all that hard to taste the main characteristics nor to taste how they interact with each other. Much lovelier than, but just as open for business as, Harvey Weinstein before the newspapers nabbed him and all those actresses shopped him. Well done them, well done Gerard for your last great Lash that will provide some lubricious pleasure for years to come for those with the magic bottles, and Harvey you are a predatory shit (although innocent until proven guilty and all of that, but I think we can be pretty sure which way the wind is blowing).

Cheers,
Davy.

Wow I love Davy’s notes.

Thank you, Todd, coming from you that is flattering indeed!

Anon,
D.

Your prose is phenomenal, as always Davy. You are making me thirsty!

Thank you for posting, old bean.

and I knew most of the words!

You had me at powerfully sweaty.

Thank you, Corey, Alan and Craig!

I think ~700 words per tasting note is perhaps on the long side, too long really, possibly even incredibly tiresome. But these were great wines and I had a lot of say about them! If, say, Mr Burghound wrote a 700 word note for each wine he tasted, he’d have to skip tasting the following, and maybe the next as well, vintage just to finish off one massive vintage report. We actually had a Champagne, a white Burgundy (Dujac Morey St Denis Blanc 09, really fascinating) and a German Riesling at the end - but as soon as we tasted each of the three red wines we knew that nothing else in the universe mattered until we’d drank these bottles dry and put the sediment on toast!

Thank you everyone who battled through these notes!

Cheers,
Davy.

Davy, it’s always great to see you posting in here. Thank you for sharing your thoughts…and great wines deserve our attention…clearly these both had your full attention.

Thanks Kirk! There were actually three of us tasting these and I had billed them as being most likely tired old beauties, so we were rather excited when they were throbbing with life. They made me feel excited and charged with life too when I had been feeling generally knackered and shagged out ever since having a cancerous growth removed. Such excitement may have caused me to write far too much…

Cheers,
Davy.

Thanks David for the valuable info.

However, fwiw, I had the 1995 La Chapelle (among other 19 vintages) last weekend …
it was excellent, even outstanding, but nevertheless (in the opinions of the whole round and in mine) behind vintages like 1996/97, also 1991 (which was in a perfect state) and also behind 1994 (which is somewhat on the same level as 1995, but now fully mature and very enjoyable).
I rated the 1995 92 points, but not more … and I think it will benefit from another 3-5 years cellaring to perform to this level …

I remember sadly when I collected the case of 1995 at Jaboulet it was only a good 4 weeks after passing of Gerard … he was such a nice guy … and imaginable the mood was in a very depressed state then … [cry.gif]

+1

Tiresome? Not in the least. Reading 50 similar grocery lists, each followed by a number 91-93, is tiresome. These were a blast from start to finish.

Davy, plain and simple your notes are fun and educational [basic-smile.gif] thanks for posting!

I appreciate the information as well as the wine write ups- many thanks; very educational.

I can vouch for the generosity of Gerard Jaboulet who gave me three bottles of the 1983 La Chapelle when I visited in 1986. I will think of him this weekend when I open my last bottle (and a few other La Chapelles).

Gerhard, despite being a rabid Lash buyer I didn’t go long on 96 or 97 because the 95 was clearly better, also cheaper and more available. I found the 94 a little anaemic, at least by the standards of great Lash vintages. Agree about the 91, if you are lucky, and can find a really well cellared bottle, they can be super fab. Gerard got an obituary in the Times and Telegraph over here - I was so sad.

Larry, many thanks, but I think 700 words per wine, even when some… especially when some of it was tangential to the wine itself, is too much. I’m glad you were entertained. Did I leave lots of rude words in? :wink:

Thank you, Scott and Blake! I don’t think I’ve been called educational since I was teaching at Oxford ending, far too abruptly, in 1999.

David, it’s been quite a while since I had the Lash 1983, but I have many, many very happy memories! Enjoy your last bottle and revel in your memories!

Anon,
D.

Well, David,

because the 95 was clearly better,

that´s what I disagree with … but at least we agree to disagree … [cheers.gif]

Just had the '96 La Chapelle two night ago: it was fantastic

Well … [cheers.gif]

Wow now I’m getting psyched up to try a Colombier Hermitage.

Great notes.

I’m not sure how I missed this thread, but wow so glad to have read the note on the 1995 Lash. As someone that is not turned off by modest bret and sometimes enjoys it in character, think of some classic Loire Chinons, and add in those earthy, sweaty saddle leather components, and you just wrote up a wine that I would likely love.