CLONYC 47 - Some 2012 Cabernet Sauvignons (Who knew it would turn into a TRB-fest?)

Yes, you read it correct, CLONYC 47. I started this thing in April 2006. Hard to believe where we have been.
Simple theme: 2012 Napa Cabs. very ‘Old School’ for CLONYC. Tweleve guests, tweleve wines, 4 flights of 3.
Lets jump into it.

2012 Maybach Materium- Dark and ominous. Pretty expressive nose of black currants and the darkest blackberries you can fine. Bold and deep and keeps with Materiums style.

2012 Becklyn- I love these type of tastings; this was one I figured for my top on the evening but as it sat between the Materium and the Stone The Crows, it just got lost. It’s a bit redder in style and certainly less exuberant on the nose, but as far as QPRs go, it shines. It is multi-layerd and quite textured.

2012 Stone The Crows – Very similar to the Maybach in style. Bold and densely packed with notes of cardamom. Big boned and tightly knit, this is winner in this vintage and in this flight. My WOTF

7 votes for WOTF go to 2012 Stone The Crows, 2 to the Maybach and 2 to the Becklyn.

2012 Hobel- Starts a bit alcoholic on the nose. In time this fleshes out to become a bit more refined and approachable but unfortunately, I am in no mood to deal with more alcohol so I dumped it.

2012 RM Panek- I always love the multi-dimensional aspects of these and this one is no different. Deftly balanced and a bit more focused than anything before it save for the Stone The Crows. Aromatics on this shows a little vineyard distinction. Always a great one to have on my table. My WOTF

2012 Schrader RBS- When we are speaking Cabernet we can’t ignore one of the bigger players in the field. This is super-dark and dense. Cassis driven with a touch of minerality, I always enjoy these more than I like to admit. Loving a $200 Cab is easy, maintaining that relationship is hard.

The Schrader got 7 votes WOTF, tha Panek 3 and the Hobel 1.

2012 Outpost Howell- I think I have moved away from mountain wines and I think I would have enjoyed the True better, but this it is and this it was. It’s clearly TRB with a more chewy tannic style.

2012 Quivet Pellet- As one of my favorites from last years Mike Smith dinner, this one seems to get a little lost in this crowd. I think it has a bit more refinement and gets clobbered in an array such as this. Had I had a better plan, I would have placed this with the Becklyn.

2012 Pride Cabernet Reserve- I am a fan of the new direction pride has taken. This is a red and black fruit wine with focus and elegance. Tannins behaved but present and finish long. Love the aromatics on this one. I wish this was served earlier and maybe with the Becklyn and the Quivet but it was too cold when it arrived in the dining room.

Between the Pride and the Outpost, this was the most diverse flight.
The Pride garnered 7 WOTF votes (me too) and the outpost 5.

2012 Vine Hill Ranch- if there is one wine on the table that I think I did not give a fair evaluation to, it’s the VHR. It was in position number 10 in a lineup of near bruisers. My notes tell me it had tremendous dept and verve amidst its classic black fruit profile. I mention super deft and very elegant but that’s about it and that is so not me. I would like to give this another try, but again, at $185+, it may never happen…
My WOTF

2012 12C Georges III- I have had this a bunch of times and it was always quite nice but tonight it comes across and pedestrian and run-of-the-mill. Dump.

2012 Plumpjack- Arrived even colder than the Pride, this had the widest style profile in the group; first it was red, then black ; it was very fragrant with notes of flowers and worn leather. It had the highest acidity of the group. It showed intense boldness wrapped within some pretty femininity. It was pretty and handsome all at once.
Loved it but loved the VHR more.

The Vine Hill Ranch had 8 votes for WOTF while the Plumpjack had the balance of 4.

In keeping with the ‘don’t think, just answer’ theme, I asked the group without overthinking it, what wine would they consider their unofficial-official WOTN.

The VHR had 6 votes, the Stone The Crow 3. The Schrader and Plumpjack 1 each and Rays vote is unreadable……

It was a fun night and was my son Michael’s first CLONYC. He was more quiet than usual. After 47 CLONYCs and a large amount of wine dinners in general I have forget what is like to go to my first one. He is untarnished whereas I am tiring. The young will inherit the world, even its wines….

A tremendous writeup, Mike. Don’t falter now–keep the good wines and the good notes coming. We must be exemplars for our young :slight_smile:

Salud,

Mike

I’m sorry to have missed this one. Would have loved to taste through this lineup.

Thanks for sharing Mike!

Sounds like a great night. I am glad to see my palate justified. Interesting enough on our Napa trips a few months ago, amongst many big boys - the VHR was our wine of the trip. I love what Bruce is doing there and he is a great ambassador for Napa and his farming as well.

Sounds great. Call it a hunch or whatever but I passed on the 2012 Panek in favor of the Calistoga/Larkmead I hope I did the right thing…

Nice write-up Mike, I particularly liked this turn of phrase:

Loving a $200 Cab is easy, maintaining that relationship is hard.

Describes well the way we felt when we had ACV ‘ghost horse’ cab last weekend.

Too bad I had to miss this one, but I was still able to catch up few nice dinners with fellows and friends along the way

Great stuff Mike. I’m glad to hear that Stone the Crows may have turned the corner. Isn’t this from the newly planted Three Twins vineyard? I probably should’ve given that relationship more time, but I wasn’t crazy about the inaugural release nor Mike’s version. I think they were only 3rd leaf vines at that point.

Yeah, that VHR definitely is at a disadvantage in that line up. It reminds me very much of Eisele. A pretty cab for sure, but to somewhat borrow a quote, loving that wine at 150 was easy, maintaining it at 185 is hard.

Schrader will be the last list I buy from if it comes down to that. Never disappoints.

I haven’t had either recently, but did try them side-by-side last summer. Both were terrific, but my wife and I both preferred the Calistoga at that point. I don’t think you’ll regret your purchase.

This rang so true with me. Loved the write up. Becklyn is owned by a good friend’s sister and brother-in-law, who I’ve had the pleasure of drinking damn good wine with (he’s also a Texas grad, so that’s in his favor as well). Great wine, great price. Mike Smith for sub $75. I had one about two weeks ago and it was slamming.

Bravo Mike.

I told Nano this would win :wink:

Jody, I would disagree that this wouldn’t show well against bruisers, simply b/c it has the texture, just far more polished than others. When all of the wines are big, some times it’s the lighter one that prevails (a la, STC 2012 too)

The guy makes what, 50 different wines? Shouldn’t be that much of a surprise!

Excited to hear that Stone the Crows was a WOTF. Not as excited regrading the 12C. Mike - I know that you previously thought I would be great in 3-5 years. Do you think it just needs time.

Yes. With dinners/tastings like such it’s all about the company you keep.

looks like i need to try Stone the Crows

This is a good point Ian, unless your palate is busted from the earlier wines.
bustedpalate.jpg

great notes- thanks!

Interesting tasting, Mr. Pobega, and even more interesting notes and thread title.

First of all, let me indicate my appreciation for TRB wines.

But the voting, notes, and overall assessment do not indicate an overall…what…“love fest?”

A top vote getter for WOTF and WOTN was a wine made by Francoise Peschon. Am I nuts? Was the Vine Hill Ranch not made by Francoise? No where is she mentioned here. Unless I am wrong… I have been wrong once or twice before. What do ya’ll think?

Hello Ms. Lindquist. What was meant by the title was the fact that unbeknownst to me when setting this up that there would be 50% of the wines accredited to Thomas Brown. Nothing to do about the overall showing but more like a ‘fest’ as in a ‘wide field of’. I also do not recall using ‘love-fest’ in such a combination or context. I hope this clears up any and all confusion and I also trust you are well. Cheers!