I think so. I find I like a bit more in wines like Cabernet or Nebbiolo but not so much in the more red fruited wines I seem to enjoy, like Pinot Noir. I think it’s the higher toned ripeness I feel it higher on my palate/nose turned to a feel rather than flavor plus the sweetness I find associated associated is bothersome whereas not so much with the former. Not so much I say. Lol
Are you asking about whether certain grapes carry ripeness better than others? I associate darker fruits with riper flavors, so your question as asked seems to me a bit nonsensical.
I do think I’m a bit more tolerant of ripeness in some grapes, such as Cabernet, than I am with Pinot Noir, though generally speaking, I prefer less ripeness in all of the wines I consume. I’ve seen you post notes on a couple Pinots that you’ve liked that have been on the riper side for my palate (not a criticism), but if you enjoy it, that’s all that matters.
Corey, I think you grabbed my thinking on this. I think I tend to like lighter bodied Pinot Noir that have little to no ripeness whatsoever but that’s not to say I can’t enjoy a riper one as well, although when it becomes more toward the extreme, I run for the hills.
Cheers.
While it’s far from exact, I agree with your point in broad terms.
If you’re going to say “pick a wine from the riper side of the spectrum,” I’d definitely think more of a zin, syrah, petite sirah, malbec, etc than a pinot.
Except for me, I’d go the opposite way on whites. If I’m ordering “more ripe within the varietal” whites, I’d sooner do it with leaner grapes sauv blanc or pinot grigio than with chardonnay, riesling or roussanne.
Barry you add tartaric acid - which is the predominant acid in grapes.
Usually titratable acidity (tartaric + others) is 6-8 g/L. But if acid is too low (and possibly pH is too high - as with very ripe fruit) tartaric acid is added. This is best done after crush but before fermentation so the acid “integrates” better, though it can be done later too.
Often very ripe must is diluted with water to bring Brix into a reasonable range, and the dilution is done with water with tartaric acid.
Besides improving taste (adding backbone), adding acid lowers pH - which in turn reduces the level of SO2 required.
I’ve noticed with some wines the acid addition is noticeable - ranging from etch your teeth to a somewhat noticeable acid edge. Age seems to help this but balance is easier if the acid add is moderate, IMO.
Fantastically informative Kim! Thanks! I love understanding this better. As I see it, what’s missing in too many ‘new world’ wines is good acidity. This is changing somewhat recently though.
I just wondered how a winemaker could get big fruit flavor while ensuring the acidity keeps up with it to balance the wine.
Fantastically informative Kim! Thanks! I love understanding this better. As I see it, what’s missing in too many ‘new world’ wines is good acidity. This is changing somewhat recently though.
The original post didn’t make any subjective statements about “too much” or “too little” ripeness, just more or less ripeness.
I don’t think it’s particularly troubling to observe that you can have grape X be more or less ripe, or that you could be in the riper or less ripe portion of the spectrum among commercial wines made from grape X.
Am I misunderstanding your comment? If so, I apologize, and please help me understand better
As a general statement, I’d say red to black fruit is a factor of ripeness, rather than variety. There are plenty of dark PNs, plenty of red Cabs. But, if you to group varieties by color intensity, Neb would be on the lighter side. When you see darker Nebs, factors may include: sites that lead to thicker skins, late picking, and “cellar stuff”.