TN: LM Birthday wines at the Palace, SF

LM BIRTHDAY WINES AT THE PALACE, SF - The Palace Steakhouse, SF (2/26/2015)

With LM, BD, and D. I’ve rarely had as good a night of wine geekery, friendly mockery, and wandering conversation threads. Manny’s tasting menu was interesting without being over-the-top, flavorful while still being eminently wine-friendly.
White
Escargot amuse
Arepas

A natural, low-SO2 white Vermentino blend from Berkeley brought by BD.

  • 2013 A Donkey and Goat Sluice Box - USA, California, Sierra Foothills, El Dorado County
    Cloudy, hazy, pale straw in the glass. Vocal nose of dried apple, tropical fruit, lime zest, [bitter wood-colored tone - musty, slate? chalk?, something I couldn’t settle on a descriptor for]. I didn’t pick up any evidence of oak. In the mouth, maybe a hint of RS (or that could be just fruit and alcohol), medium body, medium alcohol, medium acid with a tart malic finish, light bitterness. I might have liked a touch more acid, but overall I found it expressive, interesting, and delicious.
    Between 8.5 and 9

Winery is in Berkeley.
48% Vermentino
31% Marsanne
13% Grenache Blanc
9% Picpoul

50% of the wine was skin fermented for 7 days.
Minimum effective SO2 was used.
13.2% alc. (87 pts.)

Reds
Foie gras with dates, curried broccoli and deconstructed arepa fritter
Asparagus salad
Steak with purple potato

  • 1975 Château Léoville Barton - France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Julien
    First time I’ve encountered Bdx of this age - many thanks to LM for sharing this special bottle!

In the glass, medium garnet (I didn’t get a good read on the bricking in the light). On the nose, my initial impression was of acetaldehyde, lean sharp green pyrazine (St. Julien, vineyards are 72% cab, 20% merlot, 8% cab franc), undertone of brett, and a glimmer of savory, distant fruit. Over time it opened up, but seemed fleeting. I needed to listen carefully and use some imagination to reconstruct it, but it had so many interesting things to say. I wish I were alone with it in a quiet well-lit room, free of other distractions.

On the palate my first impression was one of austerity and leanness. At first (and especially after the young Vermentino blend), I thought “This is like slightly bretty, oxidative, tart, tannic water". But then I seemed to get past the initial front and found it polished, refined, and expressive - intriguing and beguiling, even. I was struck by the many tertiary aromas that presented themselves, slippery and enmeshed. I definitely felt a lack of context to really understand this, but it was easy to be drawn in. TS Eliot’s quip about great art being easy to recognize, difficult to understand comes to mind.

No score, as I have no previous context. I’ve been curious about older Bdx for a long time - it was awesome to be able to taste this.

  • 1995 Château Pavie Macquin - France, Bordeaux, Libournais, St. Émilion Grand Cru
    I brought this.
    Medium garnet in the glass, this had a beautiful nose of sweet tobacco, brown liquorice in the sun, light tones of stewed savory bell pepper, concentrated notes of black raspberry liqueur, and an underlying tamari savoriness (very light, not at the level that I get on Musar). It’s the next day and I’m still getting flashbacks.
    In the mouth it felt a bit short. Medium body, medium alcohol, medium acid, definitely plusher than Leoville Barton (both due to youth and probably because this is Right Bank / merlot based vs. Left Bank / cab based). Think a light fur coat. The finish is mostly acid and tannins though. Mostly I smelled this.

LM and BD shared their experience and put this wine into context: This is a solid example but will get better in 5-10 years. Still a bit young to their taste.

Score: Between 9 and 9.5. Despite the promise of improving with age, I was so stoked on this that I will probably drink my other bottle soon-ish. As in tonight. As in I might be drinking it right now.

Vineyard: 80% merlot, 18% cab franc, 2% cab (93 pts.)

  • 2011 Alta Maria Pinot Noir - USA, California, Central Coast, Santa Maria Valley
    Medium-pale ruby in the glass, my initial impressions of the nose were “reductive, elegant pinot.” It reminded me of a tasting I did at Vin, Vino, Wine in Palo Alto of several New Zealand Pinots. In the mouth, medium body, med+ alcohol, medium-high acid, low+tannins, and blatant wood. Well done, and in any other context it probably wouldn’t seem woody, but it did seem a bit out of place after the two older Clarets. Still, it seems like a well put-together wine.

(side note on order: LM suggested that maybe youth should precede age. Sure, older wines are lighter, but if you aren’t rushed, your palate will adjust. By contrast, it’s hard to go from subtle complexity and tertiary notes to bold, clearly-delineated flavors without them seeming just a bit garish by comparison).

12.7%

Around 8.5 (85 pts.)

Sticky
Wow. Just wow.
There was a dessert served somewhere in here that I don’t remember. The Suduiraut blew it out of the water.

  • 1975 Château Suduiraut - France, Bordeaux, Sauternais, Sauternes
    Deep copper, with a reddish hue. Clear, star bright (strong acidity?).
    This nose is rockin’! - Several different types of beeswax, saffron, icy pear, all intertwined in a dead-sexy polish. In the mouth it is medium-bodied, medium+ sweetness, medium alcohol, and strong, clean acid. It all balanced out perfectly. Extending a point about Sauternes and acid and aging that LM made, it really seems like the heart of this wine is acidity, and point of the sugar is to support that beautiful, crystalline acidity. 40 years old and shows no signs of slowing down or tiring - it seems like this wine could go on forever. I think my notes say (and I could be misreading) - “drinking burnished gold in a field in sunshine” - whatever that means.

Score: Between 9 and 9.5 (93 pts.)

My favorite quote of the night, from someone who shall not be named, speaking about a wine that also shall remain nameless: “The wine isn’t trying too hard to impress - it’s not dressed up and polished. It’s like the clothes come off immediately, but then you realize you’re having a fantastic conversation.”
Posted from CellarTracker

It was great meeting you, Rajiv, and catching up with Leon, as well. I think Dean was rather amused by the level of geek we showed. I really enjoyed the food and service at the Palace Steakhouse. An ideal location for a five hour dinner.

Your notes are excellent. I don’t think I have much to add.

Donkey and Goat: it was a moral imperative for me to bring a natural wine because Leon is such a skeptic. There are plenty of seriously flawed natural wines out there, and apologists for each of them. I am not one of those apologists. A crap wine is crap, no matter what its philosophy and I try to avoid them. Happily this wine succeeded admirably, and provided exactly what I look for in a natural wine, and wanted to share with y’all. Freshness, energy, and life. Drinking wines like this takes a completely different attitude than our standard fare. Forget noble grape this, or peak drinking window that, these wines just want to be enjoyed.

Leoville Barton: I love your impressions of this wine even though, and maybe because, they didn’t completely match up with mine. I’m not saying your wrong, but I missed both the green and Brett aspects you mentioned. Instead I took a whiff, and thought, “Yea, that’s what I expected.” It was reserved, subtle, and all about the nose. What fruit there was was dark, but it was fully tertiary and speaking more of cedar, leather, and forest floor. A truly classic claret. I don’t think Leoville Barton tries to wow, it’s too consistent and maybe understated to engage in such foolishness. Excellent.

Pavie Macquin: Man, what a contrast to the LB. It was more giving than most 95’s I’ve had. Warm red-fruit dominated, but just beginning to step out of its baby fat phase. The tannins were still quite prominent, but super-fine. This was very enjoyable today, but will be even more interesting in 5-10 years. Very good. This was an excellent example of left bank-right bank contrast.

Alta Maria: well damn, this didn’t work. We wanted to bring a nice IPOB-type Pinot to show that California can produce elegance and quality without breaking the bank. But after the two Bordeaux it didn’t stand a chance. On its own I think I would have liked it plenty, but in this company it was just too obvious, and about nothing but fruit. Regarding your note, I am not sure what percentage new oak this saw, but I think it was quite low. Ah well, live and learn. Next time I’ll remember to bring Rousseau. :slight_smile:

Suduiraut: dark caramel in color, but completely youthful on the nose and especially the palate. Plenty of acidity, but still incredibly sweet. I wonder how long it’ll take before that isn’t the first thing one notices. Still, very good, and very memorable.

Ah, much sadness about the corked Siran. Still, Leon’s birth year wines were pretty damn good. I need to turn to Piedmont for mine, and my hit rate ain’t so great.

Thanks all for their generosity. Maybe I should move here? :slight_smile:

Keep posting, Rajiv. You’ve got a knack.

The Palace is a wine group favorite of mine. Great food, great corkage policy. I’ve been there twice in the last month…

Glad you had fun!

Rajiv,
Loved your notes, especially on the DaG. You captured it nicely. I spent years riding by the Palace with no thought of eating there. Sounds like a fun venue to try a bunch of wines. Keep on posting!